abranpuko

Hahaha i wrote one zero by error

Thanks for your words. Somehow, i begun to feel like if i was the only one with problem. After, i could see they don’t appreciate the new customers that buy their product and discover its not well finished to be sold. when you i mail a supporter, i crossfingers wishing he is kind. For example Balthasar of Realtraffic is very kind. fshud support man was finally answering me to every question. He said: please, one question per mail. I did it and in the last one he was ironic. Of course all the answers didnt fix anything. The product is still the same. And i have a plus: im a complainter who is sitting in front of flightradar24 looking for mistakes. (Thats what he said to me)

Its good that you have also created a post, asking for the same i have been asking for since one month. On the other side, i dont want to feel the "obligation" to go to those 55 airport, instead of those 55000. The major airports are nice, but they are not all. Its like lloosing the opprotunity to see anf fly to another wide regions. For example: LEMG. And the major airports of France (lfpg), or ESSA, KIAH ,etc...are not covered. So... Before, we could do that. i remember very well. 😉

I never said someone could be hiding us. The information you give is not true. French airports, spanish airports, italian, greek…. European medium ones that had good coverage before, now are not covered. as you can read here, there is not only me who is saying that. people who paid a yearly subscription found also this problem since las update. There is now a post 😉

Hello. The public bets version of fshud or fsltl? when i opened a ticket in FSHUD they offered me to use a new beta. They said I was always complaining. I said to them that i prefer not to use that beta. Imagine: i buy a product, an after paying, they are offering me a beta. The beta is what i bought, because it has, unfortunately, many bugs.

Hello. Before the last Realtraffic update, i could be in LEVC, LEMG, LEAL, GCXO, LFMN, LFMS, LEBB, etc…. with better ground coverage. Now planes are arriving and disappearing almost before touching down or on runway. i can continue saying, i have tested also: EGNM, LEPA, LEIB, … Balthasar is very kind and said to me he is looking for new data. the combination RT + PSXT is beautiful!

I have recently purchased the FSHud product. Driven by the decline in Realtraffic data coverage for PSXT, I wanted to enjoy a new ATC for a bit. Also being able to go to airports with worse or no ground coverage and see how FSHud, in conjunction with FSLTL, injected and controlled planes. I read what FSHud has in its advertising and decided to spend 34 euros, convinced above all by the fact that FSHud would control each plane individually, just as they claim. In a way, I enjoyed seeing planes at airports where PSXT is now unfortunately unable to inject them due to lack of data. I also enjoyed hearing a voice direct my plane, keeping that in mind. Were there bad things? Well, that's why I write, because I want to leave my experience here: - The planes do not separate conveniently on their final approach. Go arounds again. - They are injected, (for example, by FSLTL), and from that moment on they make circular movements and take 30 minutes to land. - The jetways do not work and do not connect to the planes. - Planes do not do pushback either. They turn and leave. - Sometimes, in the sky, they go in the opposite direction to what their destiny announces. Otherwise, FSHud has good ideas. I write this because I wrote to them somewhat angry in the first instance. They answered me that I complain for all, and that the majority of customers are happy. I told them that a product that is not finished should not be sold as finished, because although the interface is very good, the planes are not actually controlled. Or, in other words: they are controlled: but poorly. There are many go-arounds. Without wanting to end up badmouthing FSHud, I commented that one hope could be BeyondATC. They told me I shouldn't be so naive and believe in software they haven't released yet. And, furthermore, BATC will not have a connection with the jetways either. In that sense, the fault lies with Asobo, which has us all wishing that they release the sdk so we can at least enjoy it. And so we are: PSXT has great real-time and historical injection, but bad data at many airports. But it doesn't have ATC. AIG injects flight plans and has a multitude of models and repaints, but they are BGL plans that often do not reflect current reality. FSLTL does exquisite things, but the planes do strange things on the approach path and land on runways that are not the ones used many times. FSHud does not inject planes, it only controls them, but it does so poorly. And Asobo puts planes in real time, but it introduces you to an Air China 747 on a small Spanish island, waiting at a gate. (apart from other worse things) If I say it's wrong, I'm unfriendly, and if I say it's right: I'm lying. I just wanted to share it. thank you.

I use PSXT with REALTRAFFIC. Actually, the data ground coverage is worst in many airports. Balthasar,the creator off Realtraffic, said to me he is looking for new providers. in the meantime, i use FSLTL to go to airports without ground data coverage. i also combine with FSHUD, but the problem of Fshud is that planes dont use never jetways. They dont pushback. so… beyondatc will be better, or psxt with realtraffic with the new data coverage in the furure. …

Oh, sorry i wrote 4080Ti, i HAVE A 3080Ti!!

Hello, with my RTX3080Ti, i cant see FRAME GENERATION on the options. Where can i activate that? thank you!

ok, thank you!

Thanks but... i have my AIG Traffic on the community folder. And FSHud. Somehow, FSHud doesnt inject anything while im into MSFS. I do all the steps, but when i begin aflightplan no ai plane is there. So, could you explain me how? a) my AIG traffic is on the community. (it works because i have tested before on another injectors like FSLTL) b) all the settings on MSFS are OFF (the setting you explain on the documentation) c) on the traffic source i have AIG injected. so... what is happening? no traffic on real time injectd. Please help me: i just bought it yesterday night.

Thank you. Its just that: i have recently bought Fshud. I load it, after i load MSFS, and have all the settings as they explained me in their documents. I start the flightplan but: no plane is there. i dont want to use FSLTL injector, so...how can i do to have real traffic with FSHud?

Hello. I would like to ask: I have bought FSHud. It says in its documentation that all have to br in OFF (Real traffic online, ground etc...). I dont want to use FSLTL with it..so: ¿is FSHud an injector? can it use the AIG models? thanks!

thank you!!!

Hi, Kiek, I have update my proffesional License of RealTraffic but PSXT (Not PSXTraffic), doesnt recognize it. It says "your RT License is expired", but it is not. PSXTraffic works well, PSXT says to me: "your RT License is expired". ¿? could you hel me? thanks!

Thank you:)

Thanks for your answer. I think people like you never die because a heart attack from anger. im sure you like me a little little bit. Its just passion. on the other side, our only hope is that the new server of Balthasar are really better than those of the last update. That “radar screen” was the way to discover that something was really bad. thanks for answering and, sincelery, a big hold! do you want me to never write to you again? or do you give me the permission to continue checking and proposing ideas even if you hate me? 😉

Thanks for the consideration. In my case, the use of the radar screen is due to three important reasons: 1) I can observe what level of data I have as coverage. I'm not interested in flying to an airport where planes disappear before touching down, or on the runways. 2) The radar screen, in the professional license, provides many data on the aircraft in its options, in addition to the usual ones. 3) Because I am free to use it since I pay for it.:) I understand that it was not the kindest response, but observing the way you responded to my last request, I could not help but writing to you with the same elegance that you had with me. At my age, I have learned to be fair. Haha!

Dear Nico, Closing a thread and leaving one of your users with the word on their lips is not very kind, but nowadays, I understand people's agitation is the face of desperate events. Your answer to me was this: Maybe you have not noticed that, but in PSXT your will see the ( out of n ) line in the right corner, the n is the number of aircraft, within your range, that you otherwise would have seen in the RT radar screen. A lot easier. and my answer is that the user is the one who decides whether or not he wants to use the radarscreen, only because he chose and paid realtraffic. In my case and in that of many, we are not content with having the "Number of aircraft within my range". We want to see it on the radar and enjoy it, even if it is not comfortable for you. That you have decided to remove it is something that, of course, you can do because you are the creator. But whether that is fair is another thing. It is not. You depend on Realtraffic to make your software work, and we users pay realtraffic. Balthasar, less cynical and more educated than you, replied that he regrets what happened and encouraged me to write to you again. Now, if you wish, you can close the thread. Or he lets people respond and talk, since we are all equally free to do so. Dear Nico, I remember that on one occasion you answered me brusquely, saying that i was the only user who cared about the planes being at the destination when they arrived, located at the same gates as reality. Now I like Learner a lot. Many people is using it. That how we make a team.

Well, I have a habit of using it. It is a realtraffic privilege, with many options. am i the only one? I see that what happens is that, for reasons of convenience, it is justified that a thing should stop being used. With the Realtraffic radarscreen we can check that the servers are working. Without the radarscreen, we can only cross our fingers and hope that the same thing we are seeing on "flightradar24" happens. It's a very strange month: - server data gets worse. - the "from/to my destination" option stops working - you announce that we will not be able to see the server data on the radar screen. and all that is called: “update”. and also a "haha". Your software is free, but it depends on realtraffic, which is not free. can you understand me a little bit?

I will not ask you anything more about real traffic. Although you use it for your software, and we pay for it. please, do not repeat to us that you “don’t own me” anything. We neither own you. We just SHARE same interests. we are also kind giving you information about the bugs or problems that are coming from PSX or PSXT. im going to tell balthasar that you dont want we use his radar screen for yout “free” software. im sure he has an aswer.

So i pay for realtraffic profesional license, but im forced to not use its radar screen because you dint want? but, nico, that is not very kind with a realtraffic user.

And how will i see the radar screen of realtraffic, using PSXT?

Hi Nico, The option "only traffic to/from my destination" of Realtraffic, doesnt work. I said to Balthasar, he said to me: talk with Nico, i havent changed anything. So, Nico, could you help me?