micstatic

My issue is they signed an exclusive weather contract with one company and as a result the weather api has to remain locked. So we will never know it appears

a lot of the snow coverage issues point straight back to them. And their are other weather companies out there that they could have contracted with.

my biggest wish would be that they (asobo) didn't have to work with meteoblue.

closing this for the other thread

The thing about these is they really only benefit you if you are flying to non payware airports.

I agree. Oddly I liked flying/landing the initial release version more than any of the patches that came out to tweak the handling when on short final.

I probably will skip this one. Are they still using the same terminal exterior/roof textures like we've seen in the other msfs projects?

Even years ago in the p3d days, Imaginesim had shown they had been leap frogged by most payware developers. I no longer consider them a viable scenery maker and would not consider purchasing any airport they make. Worse than the quality has been by the way they engage with the community. They have no problem putting a facebook post up. However they then ignore the hundreds of comments about huge missing items. Sometimes they are even given pictures and volunteers with access to the airport. They just don't seem to care.

while we are at it how about off-main screen mouse handling like any other program. It's so annoying to move my cursor from one screen to another and have the mouse wheel zoom in or out the sim if I forget to first click the other screen.

Yeah agree. I’ve never had a flight I left the gate ctd. It’s a great plane.

I admit I'm not a big 787 guy. But don't we have better options for the 787 now than we had with QW anyway?

nah. Go to anchorage or LAX. I would much rather fly a 744 than a 787.

still waiting for Sim Market also

agree. Vertical Sim is also very nice.

With the Horizon mod I'd very likely buy this product. Without I definitely wouldn't. But with LVFR success nonetheless.