andre1977

All good now. Marco.

Same here. Marco.

Hi Today i recieved a reply from Baltasar. Like Nico said the answer is the same. Changes can make this things to happen. We all dislike changes and the process of change. Human condition. Personnaly i will give the neccessary time for those changes and keep using RT/PSXT. 'Dear Marco, thanks for sharing your thoughts. It is unfortunately the case that a major traffic provider I used to have no longer wants us to have their data. I am working on a solution, but this takes time. Meanwhile I appreciate your patience and that of the other users. Kind regards Balthasar' And have a nice holidays Nico. End of topic for me. 🙂

Thats true Nico. That's one of the reason i'm here. Real time traffic and accurate. With bgl files we are always behind and i know that because i build flightplans for a Forum. I used bgl files since ever till i got here I used Microsoft Flight Simulator since my 16 years old. I'm 46 now. Its another world with RealTraffic and PSXT. Abranpuko, i'm not reach too😉 that's why i have 6 months standart and 6 months professional. I mainly fly GA and Cargo and i follow GA all the time. Many airports are empty as GA most of the times switch off the transponder before landing. Frustrating. Reading the manual i found that we can work the parking spots in the airports. What i did was fill up some parking spots with permanent GA airplanes that use that airport. At least when i takeoff and land i can see some GA in the airports. In air they are all there for sure because i fly with them. Some parts of the world traffic dessapear like in Africa. Well ,i hope that can be improved soon. Anyway its a whole open world with real data. Of course we still can't have everything we want but is very close to that. Again is just my personnal opinion and i perfectely undersand Abranpuko opinion mention before. Regards Marco.

Best thing i've been doing is 6 months Professional and another 6 months standart. Lack of traffic like Africa can be sort out with the old fashion way till better coverage. The old bgl file. Angola looks a little better now with some airlines and helis not covered. Lets wait and hope Baltasar will present us a better solutions. Giving up from RT ? No way on my personnal opinion. Marco.

I did the same several times too. Baltasar always redirect the problem to here. it is what it is. Anyway i know how to sort the issue. Thanks guys.

I have 3 packages that i build. Airlines (not my Interest except Cargo) , GA and BBJ/GOV. I have a lot of models. All from AIGAIM ( i don't use the tool ,just the models . Textures also don't use.) Models not available from AIGAIM i did a compilation of FSX models and they work on MSFS. Just not native models. Tool for the compilation is freeware and available online. Marco.

Yes Dave. I have both of them instralled on MSFS. Picture of FA7X folder. Thank you.

Right Nico. Sad sad. Thank you.

Hi I'm flying near Lagos and i can see a lot of traffic . Some of them i have installed, speccially GA. In FR24 and ADS-B the traffic is live . My position in the picture would be side by side with BAF85 and Falcon 900B . Any sugestions why we don't have the traffic please ? Thank you Marco.

Hi Nico I have this Fixes.txt file with AWG - Animawings (Romania). And InvalidAirlineCodes.txt file with DUX, ENH, EQG, EWS, FTX, GJN, JNT, LHX, MPG, OCS, RJB, RMAF, SJB, TUAF, VJE, XAH, ZAP. Most of them air GA charters and BBJ. Would you be able to have a look when you can ? Thank you.

But all the other models and textures on the same package are scanned. Strange SR-22 not be scanned.

Some of the entries <liv airl="PVT" type="SR22" title="TBAI Cirrus SR22 United Aviate Academy N841EF" atcid="N841EF" /> <liv airl="PVT" type="SR22" title="TBAI Cirrus SR22 United Aviate Academy N842EF" atcid="N842EF" /> <liv airl="PVT" type="SR22" title="TBAI Cirrus SR22T Private N842VV" atcid="N842VV" /> <liv airl="PVT" type="SR22" title="TBAI Cirrus SR22 United Aviate Academy N845EF" atcid="N845EF" />

Got it. Interesting. Running an automatic scan Cirrus SR22 comes up. When running a non-automatic scan it miss the model and textures. Why ?

Aircraft.cfg file is ok [General] atc_type=CIRRUS atc_model=SR22 Category=airplane performance="" editable=1 wip_indicator=2 icao_type_designator=SR22 icao_manufacturer=CIRRUS icao_model=SR22 icao_engine_type=Piston icao_engine_count=1 icao_WTC=L icao_generic=0

I scan non-automatic and parameters are ok as all the other GA models are beeing scanned. Only SR-22 isn't. '<parameter name="lfolder1" value="D:\MSFS_2020\Community\AITraffic_GA" />' - Entry for SR-22 package Yes my AI Traffic packages are in Community folder. Need to check SR-22 files. Strange because all textures are working well with flightplan test.

Hi Nico Yes Cirrus SR-22 is corrected coded. Cirrus SR-22 not beeing scanned. In the Log.txt: check the match to a BE36, is the wanted type an SR22? - Yes , SR-22 wanted. What do you mean match BE36 ? No reference on log file about this But i saw in a file don't remember witch one with all Cirrus SR-22 being replace by BE36 while i was flying over UK.

Speaking about GA I have TBAI Cirrus SR-22 installed and somehow isn't showing up. All textures and model being replaced by the BE36 that i also have installed. Why Cirrus SR-22 is being replaced by the BE36 ? I ran a model and textures test for the Ciruus SR-22 and all good . I used to have them and fly with them. Any sugestions please ? Thank you.

All good now. Thanks again. Marco.

Right. Will give a read on Quick Start guide. Thank you for the support. Marco.

No I didn't. It is on the manual ? IF IT IS I WILL give a new read.

Hi Nico PSXT say i need a new license when i already have a new license . No traffic at all. Any support please ? Thank you.

Hi Nico Thank you so mutch.

Hi Nico Yes i had too. Default LETO is only runway. https://flightsim.to/file/27218/base-area-de-torrejn-de-ardoz This is the only airporti found so far. No payware. There is quite some GOV and militar movements here.

Hi Nico LETO Airport can't be used in Destination Airport in UI. Airport unknow. Can you please have a look ? Thanks Marco.