Lyle221

Despite all that ^^ Jim is still right.

Jim?

It's a two-way street; there are many people who spend their time converting FS9 scenery to work in FSX.

HA, ya, what, 3 people?

Don't watch videos on youtube, and then compare them with your system

Many of them use Fsrecorder, which creates perfect smooth playback for recording videos without a studder in sight.

Who cares as your not the only one's buying add-ons. I wouldn't say this if the attitude wasn't so condescending toward FS9. The best advice for you at this stage of the game if your having performance problems is to get a better computer (Jetline Systems is a great option). To expect every developer to discontinue supporting a sim many continue to enjoy is narcissistic to say the least.

Well since the ratio of FSX vs FS9 users is about 10,000 to 100, I would say the majority of people care.

I have a very capable computer, but there is nothing you can do to up the performance of a scenery with old fs9 polygons, running in FSX.

 

I just looked on Blueprint's web site and the 25 screen shots they show and I am baffled at why you are so disappointed. They make no secret what the airport will look like.

I am not saying It's their fault that I bought it, I'm complaining of why they can't do better than they did on it.

If you were using Orbx PNW, that would have taken priority over FTX Global textures anyway.

As I've said, I'm not talking about ground textures i'm talking about textures with the autogen, the textures in autogen ORbx PNW are not any different than FTX global textures, and were the same textures as default autogen, pre-FTX global.

Orbx PNW would actually have more chance of an OOM, due to custom ground textures, and even more autogen than normal.

I'm so glad I use FSX rather than spending all my time trying to convert everything and twist and change everything to make it compatible for the archaic FS9

Hi, I'm literally tired of waiting for T7.

 

Is there no one know about release date?

 

Lee Je Won

I agree with ya, it took boeing to make the 777 in less time.

Remember last summer when everyone thought the 777 was close to release?

Hahahah, here we are, a year later!! Good job PMDG!!!

There is another one I found:

When you press the button for proximity warning test, it doesn't say "Obstacle", or "Air Speed Low"

Press it and it will go through it's bit check. Cheers.

But where is the sound..

Hello, maybe a 737 expert can help me here:

SKIP TO 4:25

If you watch this video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=MKspqDabCAk&t=259

He is going though the overhead panel stuff, and when he turns on the window heat, you hear a chime.

Than he holds down a button, it goes "TCAS SYSTEM TEST, OK".

When I do this in the NGX, it doesn't happen...

Is there a reason?

For the record what's possible with airport scenery in FSX can be done in FS9. Go look at what FlyTampa and FSDreamteam have been doing for years.

That's so untrue it's rediculous. But I really don't want to get into an arguement with you about fs9 vs fsx.

When scenery is made with old FS9 polygon code, the performance in FSX is drastically reduced. And that does not make FSX users happy.

I had my hopes up that MAYBE this one would be different, but it seems they are still not getting the message. I don't understand WHY they can't create simple things that don't make this scenery not look like it's for FS2000, make custom Apron and Runway textures, custom vehicles and trucks, and make the terminals look like actual terminals and not toys. This is 2013, they need to MOVE AWAY from FS2004, and move to FSX, so they can create more advanced scenery technologies. They need to take some advice from Flightbeam, or FSdreamteam. COME on.. This isn't rocket science.

Complete waste of $17, this doesn't look ANYTHING different from the previous version. And on top of this, they can't even provide AES support??

Do not buy this scenery, this is the last one I am ever buying from them.

I don't think it's FTXG that is saving you from OOM. It only replaces default textures with same size other textures (but much more beautiful).

 

So maybe on a longer flight you will suffer memory shortage again unfortunately.

Not true, on this page: http://www.fullterrain.com/product_ftxglobal.html

It says:

"New autogen textures for buildings"

 

YSSY was going to be the last FS9 scenery from FlyTampa.

YES!!! Thank god!! One smart buisness decision on their part!

✓ Fsdreamteam

✓ Flytampa

✓ Flightbeam

✓ PMDG

Aerosoft is almost there.

How do you old people even know how to operate a computer??

My oldies can barely operate a camera!!! ^_^

I hope it's just for FSX. We need to be done with FS9. True Story.

Well it's true, I swtiched to Active Sky 2012 because it seems like Opus turbulence was in the same area every flight.

So today, I tried something with FTX global in FSX that I haven't done for 7 years. I did a flight with autogen on EXTREMELY DENSE.
 
WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAATTTTTTTT! Yes, EXtremely Dense!!
 
Usually before If I even mentioned this word, by FSX would OOM! I couldn't believe my eyes...
 
Not only that, but I did a flight with:
 
The PMDG 737NGX, at FSDT CYVR, with ORBX PNW, and Cloudy rainy weather. No OOM! AND in DX9!!!
 
I am soo stunned. Try this out you guys, serously.
 
I am so glad I bought this addon!!! Best addon ever.
 
Incredible. That is all.

 Solution: Switch to FSX.

 ENB Caused this flickering for me, I removed ENB and Now i dont have any flickering.

This is from 2009, here is a quote from the same page:

As we all know, Microsoft stopped support for our beloved sim last year.

 Must be horrible to be so angry all the time

California

Murder

Big

Weener