Jump to content

Pilot01

Frozen-Inactivity
  • Content Count

    46
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pilot01


  1. I agree with ca_metal.As he said, I am waiting for this simulator since they announced it. I hope, they can improve the graphics a lot because this looks like fsx. (For example the cirrus clouds. They look like they have been cutted with a knife in the distance. Like in fsx: Maximum range of visibility: 160nm and after that, a clean cut and no clouds anymore.)


  2. On 10.4.2017 at 1:13 AM, Brian_A_Neuman said:

    Not to beat a dead horse here, but using the search function will answer this question very easily as there are dozens of posts referencing PMDG and if they have any plans on bringing further development to X-Plane.

     

    Yeah, I tried this as well. However I do not know why, but before I started this topic, I was searching in this forum for articels but always got error 504 (the server did not respond). So I decided to ask again. As well I was thinking that this forum is for communication and asking if something is not 100% clear.

    I had/have also the hope that PMDG might reconsider their plans with regard to X-Plane if we - the customers - say: hey, x-plane 11 is a good new simulator and we would like to fly your products in x-plane as well.


  3. Hi,

    @PMDG: do you consider to bring the 747 to X-Plane after migrating the DC 6 from X-Plane to P3D. (I am looking to use a new platform and I am not happy with p3d. X-Plane 11 seems quite promissing. One other alternative would be the new sim from dovetail games but I have some doubts, if this will be the right platform for me).


  4. Sad to hear that there are no news today, I was really excited (well, I am still excited to hear something about the new sim, even if not today, but in the future).

    But in my opinion: take your time and create a working sim, it is more important to me, that I do not have to make it run without bugs or optimize it, because this is the annoying thing and costs a lot of time, which I even could use for flying.

    • Upvote 1

  5. Man, at least let me live for a bit with the hope of a 767 lol!

     

    Sorry man:)

     

    but i do have a crazy crazy assumption for you:

    Pmdg has changed their coverpictures 4 days ago, then today. 4 days ago it was the 777. Today it is the 737. The product they published before, when i remember correctly. Maybe they will change all 4 days their coverpicture (one photo off a product they published before). The day after all "old" products have been shown, they will release the Queen of the Skies V3. (Like a countdown)


  6. Gabriel, thank you!

    I have not faced any problems yet. It runs extremly smooth on my computer, better than mega airport london 2008 and it is much more detailed.

    There is only one "problem": When you use AES you need to set this credit points. The old version needed 5 credit points and the update needs 2 credits= 7 credits for this scenery. I tried already to uninstall mega airport london 2008 to get the 5 credits back but i didn´t work. Because when you install Mega Airport London Heathrow xtended without the forerunner version you only need 5 credits instead of the 7.

     

    Is this comprehensible?

     

    P.S: When i face any problems i will write you a message.


  7. I started with Airbus X, because it looked nice and the systems were not so detailed (But after a while it is a little bit boring. I was not happy with this product after some time). After that I bought the PMDG MD-11, then the 747 and now the 777-200LR/300ER. 

     

    I think you can start with a little bit training with the T7 (Documents, Videos,....) . Enjoy it. The 777 makes a lot fun, is very detailed and looks beautiful.

     

    P.S: When I started with this professional Airplanes, my first flight was a little bit "horrible". But after some training this kind of flying was wunderful and I am happy that I started with it.

×
×
  • Create New...