peter11

Yeah I got Ftx global, much, much, much better.

If the NGX would just get updated, it would be so much better :(

Nope sorry, I have all the complex sceneries and aircrafts, and I have never had any CTD's. I get a constant 40 fps. Try again!

I just got P3D V2, and FSX looks SOOO much better than P3D... P3D looks like crap. I don't understand all this fuss over P3D -There is no home screen... #####? -Graphics are horrible compared to FSX -Frames are worse -Water looks horrible -No OOM improvement -Lack of Addon Compatibility -FSX is like $30 one time fee, P3D is like $300, and $60 for an "academic version" with watermarks and limitations -No missions -P3D has loads of bugs FSX has worked fine, error and OOM free for me since day 1.

That's because the Jetways at FSdreamteam airports are default jetways. Default jetways from FSX always sink in the ground, same with P3DV2. Flightbeam airports, Taxi2gate all do the same thing.

Why is this so amazing? It's a default aircraft... I can do that same thing in FSX..

Why would they even *think* of doing something like this... First, P3D has quite a bit of bugs to sort out, (from the looks of this thread), so they certainly don't need to spend any time modeling Indianapolis. Second, P3D's purpose is to improve things that lack from FSX, (It's basically FSX, but more finished) Like, DX11, shadows... etc. It's not to do stuff like this, they leave this to the developers, just like when FSX was created. And in the unlikely event that P3D ever did "model" Indianapolis, they would probably have to do all the other major hubs too, which is completely missing the point of FSX and P3D.

Well I can get 60 fps Easy in FSX with default anything so..

Can someone tell me what license is the best?? Academic license???

OMG. I am now switching to P3D v2, tomorrow as it comes out!!! This is the new flight sim

Thanks!

Hi, someone told me Digital Aviation was working on a CRJ, but all I don't see any progress from them. They say they are in Beta Testing, but it's been since 2010. Has the project been cancelled? I hope not, a crj for FSX is desperately needed.. Thank you.

I really don't mean to be rude, but those shots don't look very good at all... I can't "do better" by any means, but unless it's freeware, I wouldn't buy it. I think the OP said "Quality" rendition, so, to answer your question, no, none that I am aware of.

A lot of people have been saying that if P3D becomes popular enough PMDG, they will eventually switch. And I didn't mean "Wasted" in that way. If all developers are starting to drift off of FSX for P3D, you WILL switch, leaving all the add ons you flew with FSX "a waste". I mean, do all of you that had FS9 years ago that bought add ons for it, still fly FS9 just for those old add ons?

Well the migration from FS9 to FSX was very gradual, over years and years... But thanks for the answer

Like should I jump ship now, before all the developers start going to P3D, and I have all this money wasted on FSX... like exactly what happened with FS9 users.

Hi everybody, I have a question to all of you, excited to hear your thoughts... With the release of P3D V2, I see a-lot of the big name developers (except PMDG) going over to P3D, and showing new features, and stuff, they hint that they now favor P3D. I don't know about you, but now I am very very hesitant to buy anymore add ons for FSX, because I am afraid in the years coming, developers are going to start abandoning FSX, and going to P3D. Just like they did with FS9, to FSX... I have tons of $$$ invested in FSX, do you guys think I should hop the bandwagon now to P3D before it's too late??? I hear a-lot of people saying PMDG will move over "eventually". After all, P3D is still being supported and developed., and FSX isn't. ..

They posted this on their Facebook page today. Very cool...look at those shadows!!! https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=402681973168663&set=a.349912155112312.1073741828.339691029467758&type=1&theater

Nope, the purchase source is still from Germany.

FSDT airports are all in that range, same with Flightbeam.. Flytampa. I would say $32 is appropriate. But unfortunately I will never be able to buy this one because my credit card company has blocked all purchases from Germany due to "Fraud".

You can throw all the technical jib jab at me all you want, explain FSDT's excellent frames at their airports then. And if Animated Jetways have such a high performance cost, than doesn't adding AES just cost more FPS then? hmm..

Obviously wrong, default gates do not affect fps that much. Yes, it's an easy way to save FPS, but look at ALL of FSDT's airports. They all have default jetways and FSDT KLAX has excellent frames. And the same could be said about any add-on. Go say to Fsdreamteam "This is a FLIGHT simulator, not a GROUND handling simulator", or "This is not an airport simulator". All of the small things add up to make the most realistic experience, so yes, we should focus on this.

Why is PMDG the ONLY company in the world not supporting P3D? Kinda foolish if you ask me.. This looks amazing.

If a scenery has moving jetways, AES can STILL make better jetways for that Airport! Look at FSDT KLAX. AES isn't just limited to airports with fake jetways. Therefore, there is no reason...