kaha

1 hour ago, Mace said:

+1.  I want something I can flick over to Europe in, maybe without having to stop in Gander or Reykjavik.   Don't get me wrong, I like the shorter-range bizjets, and I can still go transatlantic with the stops, but it's not a G-V or something like that.

Didn't FSW mention that a Falcon was planned (?), but far into the future I think from the sound of it.  Maybe I was dreaming and never saw that post.

At least FSW had a nice Falcon on P3D.

Karl

I also work on a 4K very large monitor. I'd rather want to keep the small font and images.

Thank you for your excellent software!

That's a pity! Because they are so good.

Karl

12 hours ago, DAD said:

OK, found the AP master switch. started for a morning flight out of LOWI ...

LOWI is still closed, opens again tomorrow. 😁

Karl

As Carenado do not deliver any documentation, what POH would you use aside the Seneca?

Karl

What's the time frame? 3 p.m. Zulu?

Karl

6 hours ago, RW1 said:

Almost 2 months waiting.. Unreal!

It probably will be there in time to get broken by the next SU.

Karl

I use the video capture tool of GE, it is the best in my opinion. I don't see any drawbacks when using GE.

Karl

4 minutes ago, Moria15 said:

I will look forward to testing what you produce 🙂

Graham

Maybe some of you remember AAM (Aircraft Airfile Manager)?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/i6z0is1b59ckraq/AAM.png?dl=0

Karl

5 hours ago, roland said:

I wish there would....

 

Then it's time to make one....

Is there any software that allows for easy editing of the engines.cfg? Or are we left to use a text editor? Nothing in the SDK?

Karl

6 hours ago, Glenn Fitzpatrick said:

 

Thanks for that. For my eyes render scale 130 seems to be the sweet spot for viewing the cockpit writing. 

This. However, It could already be too demanding for the GPU.

Karl

That's how it looks on my 4K monitor.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/n8pzp4teshw6tha/Renderscaling 4K.png?dl=0

Karl

When compensating the LOD I experience stutters when panning.

Karl

1 hour ago, ARCO said:

Ses, did you try MSFS Add-on Linker? If not, do try it and revert here with your opinion, it is simpler, faster, more efficient, user friendly, and... no CTD! Available at Flightsim.to.

 

...and healthier for the SSD.

Karl

Or they could have said nothing at all and wait until release time. 

Actually, as I get it if the NG3 is released I can get the P3D version and pay the rest for the MSFS version. The P3D version is literally a giveaway then, isn't it? Nice!

Karl

PMDG just need to brand the 737 differently from NG3 and nothing they said applies to the "new" product anymore.

That said I don't think they will do that.

Karl

1 hour ago, kaha said:

Is the NXi 0.3.0 installed in the DA62 by default? 

Karl

Disregard, got it. It's a free download.

Karl

And there are signs the A320 from Fenix will stay below 100,-

140,- is a tad overpriced? For MSFS at least.

Karl

So their 737 in MSFS will be 140,-. Good to know.

Karl

Is the NXi 0.3.0 installed in the DA62 by default? 

Karl

35 minutes ago, Jeff Nielsen said:

Keep in mind, we haven't seen what features (modelling, systems, etc..) PMDG has for MSFS either.

Prosim has a 737 also. So, given Fenix will not stop developing for MSFS after their A320 release I could imagine they then make a 737. If they do, they should let us know about it before PMDGs 737 is ready.

Karl

I remember I had an addon in FSX and P3D called "Salmon River". It featured some strips in Idaho. I'd like to have it in MSFS. One of the strips here IRL:

Karl

This would be cool. I had a lot of fun with it in P3D.

https://www.xtremeprototypes.com/shopexd.asp?id=47

Karl

Alaska:

https://return.mistymoorings.com/z20_homepage/index.php

Karl