Greek

Watch this:

How often do you see clouds from inside and outside an airplane when the sun is setting and rising?

MSFS is not 'MS Flight 2'.

I want MSFS (W)LAN parties.

@cmpbellsjc He means forum members, not any directors.

@Wobbie https://msgpwebsites.azureedge.net/fsi/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/DR-map-4.02.png

Enough with the 'study-level' nonsense. 'If' they can? Of course they can, and they will, and in record time (in comparison with the add-on companies). Yes, it does need to be 'down to the voltage'. Everything must be better, and will be better, than everything that was available before. It is a new simulator, and the goal is to make it the best flight simulator on the market. Full stop.

v5 is nothing special.

OK, a firetruck is also a motorcycle then.

And? They have scientists and engineers, they are in contact with the aircraft manufacturers, all of them had to fly, and a few in the team were working on getting their PPL (Private Pilot License). They also work and will work with people who have flown for many hours one, a few, most, or all of the aircraft that will be included in MSFS. https://youtu.be/nmfmYfXOI1w?t=67 https://twitter.com/swloch Sebastian Wloch flies. The guy in Episode 3: Aerodynamics. https://www.linkedin.com/in/martial-bossard-78b2141/ Martial Bossard does too. The guy in Episode 4: Cockpits. Microsoft hired and hires the right people, not 'randoms'. The military uses game controllers too. Does that make anything they do, a 'game'? MSFS does and will have support for many input devices. And since they will continue working on MSFS for at least 10 years after its release. I can say with certainty that input devices with haptic technology are supported or will be supported too.

Aerowinx is not a game. Simulators are simulators, and games are games. A software product could be both. In the case of MSFS, from https://www.flightsimulator.com/june-20th-2019/: "We are making Microsoft Flight Simulator. Emphasis on the word SIMULATOR." @Concodroid The people who call it a game have no knowledge about these things, and are interested in having opinions instead of wanting to learn all the things they know nothing about or very little about. Opinions do not matter, only the facts matter.

There is no 'eye candy' in MSFS. It is a simulator. By definition, 'eye candy' is something that is not required. Whoever disagrees can go back to wireframe graphics.

Physical modeling synthesis for the audio!

Why it has not been fixed all this time?

that should be changed to Website: https://www.flightsimulator.com

@Superdelphinus About the number of computer hardware component combinations. CPUs: Intel and AMD. GPUs: Intel, nVIDIA, and AMD. Motherboard chipsets: Intel and AMD. System firmware: UEFI. There are computer standards that must be complied with. There are quite a few people who believe that MS hired 'randoms' to make the new FS. No. They hired people who know what they are doing. Full stop. Professional software testers.

"Tech Alpha test"? The word "test" cannot be found anywhere in the Development Roadmap. Why do you believe that they need testers that are not Microsoft employees?

People, do you really believe they need anyone to test anything for them? We are talking about Microsoft here. The company has been around for over 40 years now. They know what they are doing.

Once they publish the system requirements, you will learn if you need to buy new hardware or not.

MSFS. In 2019, and all the next years, everyone will know that it means the one from Microsoft that will be released in 2020.

You mean in an MSFS world.

The moment it is released, I want it to be the best flight simulator on the market, and I want the Pilatus PC-24 also.