Question: Is there anyway to get the PIC767 to work in FS2004?Dear forum readers and community. When this question listed above gets asked again,and no doubt it will, what we ALL should respond with is listed below. After the post is answered once, no one should respond again to any other posts pertaining to the thread, unless it is re-posted another time in a new thread, by yet another bonehead who is to lazy to search.I personally, am really sick of hearing that the pic767 is being "chopped up" in feable attemps, to make it work in FS9. The 767V2 is coming. Paitence is required.OFFICIAL ANSWER: asked many times...answered many times...you might want to try a search.My $0.02 worth...

I tend not to get annoyed at such trivialities.

Bill,Although I myself at times feel annoyed by posts such as that - perhaps it would be better to just NOT RESPOND at all for those that it bothers so much.There are more than enough people who would take the time to either answer or supply a link to another thread containing the answer.Seeing how this is a public forum it is your right to answer people's posts in any way you choose - just as it is their right to ask a question that is annoying and has been asked 762 times in the past 6 weeks.I truly hope that sort of answer is never the OFFICIAL anything in this forum.

ok Ian I hear you. I should have titled it The Un-Offical Answer/Response. Appology

Or, you could just link them to a thread with the answer. But hmmm... That would be polite, so I guess it's out of the question. We gotta show the frustration to feel good.DP.

?