in updating some of the existing s/s's, i notice that often someone has added fixes to the end of what appears to be the original sorted list. they are "colocated" fixes, so i assume they tacked them to the end because the parent fix must be defined first (according to the manual). everything seems to work ok, so i guess my question is- does it matter now or will it matter down the road if the fixes are not sorted (other than it is much easier for me to work with a sorted list)?thanks,sal

Hi SalWhile I was initially creating the program to make the procedures I was not told about the fixes having to be in any particular order. I put them in alpha order because that makes them easier to read. The COLOCATED fixes are at the end because generally they are the result of an ARC and I decided to keep ARCs together and put them at the end of the fixes. The COLOCATED fixes can be defined before the fix used in the command if you like.RegardsTerry

thanks terry, that will make things a lot easier for me!sal