Just wondering...I have recently purchased My Traffic and Ultimate Traffic. Both have their strenghts and weaknesses: My Traffic seems to be more comprehensive in numbers of airlines and locals--for instance, airports in Uganda and Tanzania, which I like; however, in the US, it has a very odd selection of airlines at particular airports: American at Fargo, and Soviet aircraft (can't remember the airline) at Fargo as well. Ultimate does a nice job at US airports, but Entebbe and Dar seem vacant as does, surprisingly, Malta Luqa! So, what about FS Traffic 2004?Would it be possible to install all three commercial programs, then delete specific airline files so there is no overlap--for instance, use only Ultimate United for instance, so you would have a nice, and thorough mix of aircraft and flights around the world? It wouldn't matter to me if FS Traffic and My Traffic were not according to exact schedule.I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on this. Parking is still a problem for me: Amsterdam looks silly with most of the planes at remote sites and Fargo silly too, with United and NWA parked at the National Guard facility! But still, I like to fly all over the world and would like a reasonable representation of flights without having to do all the extra installing etc., that adding them on my own would entail. I just don't have the time.ThanksBill

Visit http://www.mostrealisticai.com and get AI flightplans from there. They have autoinstaller, are very accurate and free.