I think I have found a computer that might give FS2002 some good speed. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/02may_supermodel.htmTerry

I have two of them. With the DF734 on the ground at SimFlyer's KLAX, I only get 12 fps. What a waste of a few million dollars.Thomas LinTaxiwaySigns.comVolunteers (testers and designers) needed, please visit the site for information

Sounds like that Microsoft "Code" again.Terry

We share the same sense of humor!I was about to make a similar remark but you beat me to it.A lot depends on efficiency of code.We lost a lot of that when system memory mushroomed and code got sloppy.In the old days when memory was at a premium we had to learn to program very efficiently :-)

It's always there but rarely read ... Page 2571. Ever get the problem where you get to page 4 or 5 when starting at the beginning and you miss something because it has jumped back to page 1 where you started? Never happens on page 2571 ... until now. So, I thought I would see what is on page 2571, the answer is the same as page 1 just old.Ooops off topic *:-* So anyway. Working on the standard that after 3 years a computer is out of date and needs to be replaced (not talking FS PCs which are updated every month ;) ) I wonder what NASA are doing with this beast, could be useful.Andrew Brown