Sign in to follow this  
Guest georgi55

GF4 4200. Which is better for FS2002? 64MB or 128MB?

Recommended Posts

At most benchmarks, 64MB shows better results, but when AA activated and made at high resolution, 128MB shows better results.So, which one should I get for FS2002? Price is not a factor because there is only $20 difference between two of them.Any sugestions/experiences?Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

Anti-Aliasing takes away from texture buffering memory on the card. Having the extra 64 megs generally means you have the space to keep the textures in local ram (video) vs having to swap them over the apg port from system ram (agp aperature area). This is the performance difference seen. Swapping is a performance hit.For $20, there really is no question. It would be silly to cheap out by that much for that much ;-)Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this