Jump to content

fenixtucu

Frozen-Inactivity
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    34

  • Donations

    $0.00 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fenixtucu

  2. Posted

    After testing Windows 10 since March I must say that compatibility with FS9 has been a hit and miss but improving. Having said that however, the last build of Windows 10 (build 10130) at least for me it broke the FS9 main menu and alt menu when running in full screen mode and it just shows a black screen. The sim itself runs fine in Windowed mode displaying the main menu and when in flight while in full screen mode but you can't access flight maps to consult frequencies and headings in FS9 because that would run under the same environment of FS9s main menu showing a black screen.

     

    I hope this is a momentary issue and not something permanent as FS9 was working flawlessly in Windows 10 build 10122 released a week earlier. Apparently the next build will be released next week so it is possible this is a temporary quirk rather than a permanent one.

     

    Fingers crossed.

     

    I am throwing this question to the community... Is the same issue I am describing on this thread happening to your Windows 10 test computer with preview build 10122?

     

    Thanks!

     

    I have exactly the same issue in Windows 10 pro: main menu and alt menu when running in full screen mode shows a black screen

  4. Posted

    Well, strictly speaking, apart from the fact that this was said by the European Court of Justice, there is nothing new in this notice. It is all about an old principle called "private property". The Court just reinterpreted the limits of "private property" right.

     

    Nobody can tell you that you can not sell a "thing" (whatever it is a house, a car, a right, or a piece of software) that, after the purchace, was introduced into your own domain. DLCs are unconstitutional in that part of the agreement. This kind of clauses are very common in adhesion contracts (contracts were a party just have to accept -or not- a preset agreement, but can not modify its clauses, like credit card agreements). But they are commonly unconstitutional too.

  6. Posted

    Yes. In each folder of every aircraft you want not to being recognized by FSInn, you need to create a file called "FSInn.cfg". It should contain two lines:[FSInn]ignore=1Of course, if you create such file in the plane you're going to fly, you will need to edit FSInn in order to recognize you, because when you start FSInn, your plane will appear as "zzzz".Do I make myself clear, or my english is too bad?

  8. Posted

    So... why don't people simply react in the same way when it comes to FSX and MS Flight...?
    Simple... . Because we are all different. As many people think Flight is great, others would like to compare it with FSX, and perhaps think FSX is better and offers lot more than Flight does.So, as you said, peace to everyone with what they think.I have to agree with you in something, they are different things. FSX is a sim that brings you a wide sphere of posibilities, Flight is trying to be a game... for now, just trying.

  9. Posted · Edited by fenixtucu

    Posted Today, 05:02 PMpmanhart, on 06 March 2012 - 02:41 PM, said:Do we really want to pin our hopes and dreams on less aircraft, less scenery, and less access, for much higher cost and slightly higher FPS?
    Yes. Sometimes less is more.
    Flight is less than FSX? absolutely... you're right!

  11. Posted

    Although its novelty, and its nice graphics (some of them, because clouds are awful), etc. ... generally speaking, I didn't like Flight much.

    Do I like Flight's gameplay? No.This is in fact the biggest beef I have with Flight. It is as ambiguous and undefined as the MS promotional info for it. It makes some sense, because even MS doesn't know what it wants Flight to be - and it shows.Flight is neither a good flight simulator nor a good flight game. This is the real problem. It is good at nothing. It is a hodge-podge of features and half-implemented features tossed together that come off as badly designed and half finished, completely devoid of polish in most areas.What is the logic behind having to click on each airport to find the one with a specific ICAO code, instead of picking it from a list. Why is there no way to start from a parking position? Why does it have to be a chore to find a job that I might want to fly? Why is there no list of jobs for all of the airports? What is the point of doing any of these jobs? Why is there no career where I would have a reason to fly efficiently - perhaps earn money to buy fuel and repair the plane, which would nicely lend itself to in-flight failures. Why is there nothing interesting to do, besides sight-seeing at tree-top level or do some repetitious and pointless tasks?Where is my flight log-book? Where is my kneepad with v-speeds and limits? Where is the documentation for the planes?I have a thousand questions of this type and when I sum it up, Flight is a below-average game and far below-average simulation at a price-point that is way too high for the mediocre implementation.$15 for the Maule without an autopilot and documentation? Really? $8 for the hull of the Mustang? Really?How are all these new players ever going to learn to fly when there is hardly any info in Flight about how to fly? Flight is far more a game than a simulator and it is a bad game at that. Fly a 200+ nm trip over water at 140 kts to deliver some overweight cargo? That's the game? Yep, that's it.
    I agree with Attila. The fact is that Flight does not incorporate nothing new to the scene. As a game, I get bored really quickly, and as a sim... well, of course It is not one.

  12. Posted · Edited by fenixtucu

    I love today Avsim's review. It says:"Flight Simulator is an excellent game where we all pretend to be pilots of different sorts... Flight is no more, nor less, a game than Flight Simulator X and has all the same hunts and hoops that are present in that game...""First of all, there are no jetliners, in fact, no jets of any sort. No helicopters, no sailplane, no Extra aerobatic airplane. No Cessna, no training syllabus, no Rod Machado jokes. No Artificial Intelligence (AI) aircraft traffic, no Air Traffic Control (ATC), no Flight Planner, and no Real Weather. No worldwide coverage with 24000+ airports...."Hahaha... wasn't it a game like FSX?... yes, but without nothing.

  15. Posted · Edited by fenixtucu

    No entire world simulatedNot 3rd party software allowedOnline play mode only controlled by Microsoft (only 20 or 30 players ??)Not SDKIs there any advantage? This sounds like Vista: it was dead before it came alive...Perhaps I'll download it and try it, but definitely I will not pay for it, neither their addons. Dev team have to think that a lot of people are still using FS9, even though it is an old peace of soft, and the reason of that is that flight sim enthusiastics prefered realism, in planes and ATC, good networks (no Windows Alive), to take control of their own peace of software (SDK), good addons (like PMDG, Flythemaddog, Aerosoft, etc)

  25. Posted

    I'm almost done guys!!! Several bugs corrected... now finishing the last corrections to the bitmaps... now it comes the difficult part... obtain permissions for gauges...wish me luck!
    Well.. good luck .. and we´re here waiting for your news. And... thanks again man, for all the time you spent in this project..!
×
×
  • Create New...