April 20, 200323 yr Air Canada flight plan LLBG/26 2230ZDEENA1E.GITLA.UW13A.VELOX.UR18.ALSUS.UB15.VESAR.UL619.MAKOL.UL602.WRN.UL619.ARGES.UT705.BUKAN.UL850.BUDEX.UL850.FRE.UG1.RDG.UL604.ERL.UL604.HMM.UL602.GOW.UN580.TIR.UN572.57N010W.58N020W.58N030W.58N040W.57N050W.DCT.LOACH.DCT.FOXXE.DCT.YBG.DCT.YOW.J546.YSO.V37.YYZ.CYYZ/24LCruise was FL310 at 470 TASAlternate: KBUFCYYZ.CYYZ3.YYZ.V252.BULGE.DCT.KBUFFL090 at 284 TAS-david-
April 21, 200323 yr hello davidwhat kind of etps it was60,120,138, or 180'....do you know what etps airports scenariis was inside ???!!!phil
April 21, 200323 yr The plan states 'Extended Range Twin Engine (ETOPS) Flight Plan'Fuel was adjusted 1% above average consumption.ETOPS alternate was BIKF/CYYRI don't see anything relating to 60, 120, etc. Is there some menomic that would be associated with the information you want.I'm sorry I don't understand your last question.-david-
April 21, 200323 yr David,The fuel consumption adjustment does not relate to ETOPS. AC does not state the ETOPS limitation on their flight plans. If you tell me the FIN number I can give you the ETOPS limitation.Best Regards,
April 21, 200323 yr Thanks for that. Where are the FIN restrictions defined?(ie: how did you know that? ;-) )-david-
April 22, 200323 yr the erops or etops scenarios was only two airports sometimes this is more only thant and you answered and now i got too the rule about 180' limits...thanks a lot guysphil
Create an account or sign in to comment