Hi, just been back from the flight CX250. Unfortunately theflightplan was not available during the flight, if anyone canget a copy of it somewhere afterwards could you post it hereplease? Thanks a lot!Also, I'd like to have the flightplans for BA25 as a comparison,thanks again!

CPA250 EGLL/VHHH 30th March 2006 1750zETE: 11:02B744N0492F310 DCT BPK UM185 CLN UL620 TULIP UR12 JUIST UP729 TALSA UP730 CDA UM611 MALIV UP862 TOMPA UP862 LIMAK G59 GR R30 KTL R22 BUKET R22 ZJ B200 KD A575 UNWW B330 NIGOR B330 MORIT B330 POU R473 SIERA DCTBAW25 EGLL/VHHH 30th March 2006 1725zETE: 11:12B744N0485F310 DCT BPK UM185 CLN UL620 TULIP UR12 JUIST UP729 TALSA UP730 CDA UM611 ELVIX UM611 KOLJA UM864 LIE UM869 OPOKA G3 TU R11 FV G3 QL B365 BK B923 GUTAN A368 URL G3 AKB A368 KRG A368 AGUSA A368 FKG B215 YBL B330 GYA B330 POU R200 ZUH R473 SIERA DCT

Thanks very much for your information!Is the route of CX250 the shorten version or the original version?The captin told us the flight time would be 11:05 but the flighttime was shortened by 9 minutes. The ATE according to my stopwatchis around 10:56'30.ps. Airborne time: 18:52, Touchdown Time: 12:48 (All local time)pps. Btw, where did you get these information? Is the site confidential?

These are the original flightplans submitted to ATC before the flight departs. They might not represent the exact actual route flown by the aircraft.The actual flight time could have been a bit shorter (or longer in fact) for any number of reasons, such as more or less favourable winds than forecast, ATC shortcuts or re-routes in-flight, weather avoidance, etc...9 minutes over an 11 hour flight is only around 1% difference in flight time and a combination of the above could easily cause this.

Yes the wind was really favourable along the way, but the captinhad told us that he did shorten the route. Is there any way thatyou can get the route modification as well? Thanks a lot!