>Any suggestion?A better wiki system like Wikipedia or Freeciv uses it,would be fine.SeedWiki is ugly and uncomfortable, comparedto MediaWiki.MediaWiki is much better and easier to use.http://meta.wikimedia.orgAnd an easy to use wiki system is important to improve the flightgear documentation.

> And an easy to use wiki system is important to improve the flightgear documentation.Yeah, I certainly agree with you there. The documentation is lacking and it is difficult for users to improve the system. I didn't even know that there was a wiki thing for documentation.Given that I am fairly unenlightned about wiki in general, could you explain what needs to be done to impliment metawiki?

If you want to colaborate on an A300 give me an email. The address is on my site.

>>Given that I am fairly unenlightned about wiki in general,>could you explain what needs to be done to impliment>metawiki?It is called Mediawiki not metawiki.Here's an install guide:http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_U...e:_Installation

Thanks for that Honkar,So, could the wiki software be run on the FlightGear server? Or could it be viable to get one hosted?