January 26, 200323 yr Well, after seeing the posts on PC performance and Enditall among others, I finally installed Enditall 2.0 on my Windows XP Home Ed PC. It did nothing to improve performance. It left a lot of applications open because Windows says it needs them to function normally. So I uninstalled it. Enditall doesn't seem to do anything for XP compared with Windows 98 where it increases my available resources at bootup from 75% - 77% to 89% - 91%.So I just ordered another 512 MB or Rambus RAM instead !JS Jonathan Sacks Dell XPS Gen 4, Pentium IV Northwood extreme 3.8Ghz, 3Ghz RAM, eVGA 7900 GTO, 12 GoFlight modules plus MCP-PRO AP and EFIS, GF pedestal, CH rudder pedals, CH throttle quadrant, 42" LG LED, 24" DELL LCD, Windows XP, FS2004, FSUIPC 3.96 FS Autostart 1.1 (Build 11), FS Navigator 4.6, UT, FE, GE, REX, PMDG, Level-D, PSS, etc.
January 26, 200323 yr I found the same results in my XPHome computer. Enditall used to really help my 98 machine too. Of course, this XP unit without any help makes for some smooth flying but I too have ordered more memory.
January 26, 200323 yr I like Enditall 1.0 a LOT better. All you have to leave open is Explorer & Systray.
January 26, 200323 yr >I like Enditall 1.0 a LOT better. All you have to leave open >is Explorer & Systray. 1.0., with XP, kills something that makes it impossible to use third party weather programs, such as FSMeteo and ActiveSky. 2.0, when using first the "close all" and then the "kill all," allows me to use them.
January 26, 200323 yr Author Take a look here: http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/servicecfg.htmIt's about tweaking XP's services and setting up a gaming platform...no need for EnditAll...Rob "Holland&Holland" de VriesFor accurate and custom made ambient and nature sounds(sets) for Lago's FSSoundscape go to:"What Is It Like to See with Your Ears"
Create an account or sign in to comment