What are your opinions on these two? I tried Active Camera a while back and it had disappearing ground textures and didn't play well with my Track IR4 (I forget the details but it was annoying enough that I uninstalled AC). How about Walk & Follow?

I don't know about W & F, but this freeware tool offers in addition to recording flights unique camera views:http://www.fs-recorder.net/-John

>I don't know about W & F, but this freeware tool offers in>addition to recording flights unique camera views:>>http://www.fs-recorder.net/>>-JohnAny problems using that software with TrackIR4?Cheers,JohnBoeing 727/737 & Lockheed C-130/L-100 Mechanichttp://www.sstsim.com/images/team/JR.jpgwww.SSTSIM.com

Don't know, I don't have TrackIR4 but I know a lot of members here have the recorder utility--maybe someone can answer.-John

First of all TrackIR generates its own head latency, which is natural. If Active Camera is installed its head latency is counteracting with TrackIR

>First of all TrackIR generates its own head latency, which is>natural. If Active Camera is installed its head latency is>counteracting with TrackIR