Looking for Feedback on MSE 2.0 for ME and VT

I'm curious to know from anyone who has purchased MegaSceneryEarth ME or VT who also has NH 2.0. Specifically, I am interested in how seamlessly the two scenery areas blend. I currently own v1.0 tiles of Northern Arizona and Southern Utah, and while I am marginally satisfied with both of these independently, I was disappointed to see that there is no blending between the two coverage areas, and there's a jarring strip of default FS scenery between them which really detracts from the "immersive VFR experience". Moreover, the Arizona photography has a marked tint compared to Utah scenery - there's no color transition. I have some concern after seeing the 2.0 screenshots of MA (which apparently are only 1.0 and 2.0m resolution) and just how "blue tinted" everything is. I am concerned the 2.0 products may suffer the same ills as its predecessor. I am contemplating purchasing the 50cm aerials of VT and ME to accompany my NH scenery, but don't want to put money down if there is a glaring difference between them. Can anyone comment to this effect?

J

PS. I *love* NH 2.0, incidentally, for anyone thinking about dropping some money on New England photo-scenery. Stunning visuals statewide.