Did everyone ever notice that the ILS for 36L (FSATC: 1L, why?) at EHAM is missing? I guess, because there is no "center" runway in FS9ATC that it automatically assumes that 36C is 36L.I got an FS9ATC approach onto 1L and the ILS (I guess it was 111.95) was dead. 36C worked fine.One more reason to look forward to RCv4 ;-)

There is no ILS on 36L at EHAM.The old 1L is the current 36C, you got your numbers mixed up I guess :)

Okay, that clears it up. EHAM 36C = 1L.

(FSATC: 1L, why?)FS2004 is October 2002 data. The runway designators changed after the data was compiled for FS2004.Unless you have a new approach file - you do not want to change the designators for a runway - that will break all the approaches.Jim Vile has done a great job for EHAM to update the approaches, add the new approaches for the new runway, add the new runway - for the default airport - search under his name for his Active ILS in the Avsim library.