172 flight model

[Guest Vilk]

it may not be new. i vaguely remember seeing a similar report somewherei wasn't happy with the default air file so i substituted the old realair one from fs9. wasn't quite happy either. today i diffed the aircraft.cfg, default and realair, and updated the default with the realair values wherever they diverged. excellent--stalls, spins and slips very convincingly now (and i mean _very_ convincingly: the real crate is rather reluctant to spin with most loadings; this new configuration models even that)i have no idea if what i see is grounded in any sim modelling reality or it's just the placebo effect. if you care (and if you have a few hours on the type) try it and let me knowmuchas graciasvilk

[FlyingsCool 3]

That's pretty funny. I just did and asked the same thing the other day. I am wondering the same thing but have not yet gotten any opinions yet either.http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...89756&mode=fullThomas[a href=http://www.flyingscool.com] http://www.flyingscool.com/images/Signature.jpg [/a]I like using VC's :-)N15802 KASH '73 Piper Cherokee Challenger 180

[Guest Vilk]

:-)there you go...i agree with your "benign" comment, not sure about the "too", i think it's pretty realistic. sometimes i would take a 172sp to the practice area to do stalls and spins and come back quite frustrated--no honey. you have to be very assertive with the controls to make her go over, i mean really yank and kick, and then she will straighten out immediatelyin any case, full credit for the diff goes to you--you were there first :-)

[FlyingsCool 3]

I'll bet I'm not the first, just happened to notice your post and I am wondering if anybody else has any comments.Thank you for yours! :-)Thomas[a href=http://www.flyingscool.com] http://www.flyingscool.com/images/Signature.jpg [/a]I like using VC's :-)N15802 KASH '73 Piper Cherokee Challenger 180