CDalal

Do you know if the performance would be equivalent to FS9? FSX can sometimes take advantage of newer features in hardware that FS9 cannot so that's why I ask.

This is what I have now:19" monitor with 1280x1024 resolution, just one monitorFS2004Intel Core 2 Duo @3.0ghz4GB RAMGeForce 9600GT 512MBI'm wondering what is the best card that I can get, which will give me the most performance I can get with high FS settings. I realize that a great graphics card will not make FS that much better, but I also know that the wrong card can really make things a nightmare.

I've had plenty of the error messages, and usually I'm able to solve them with the issue typically lying in botched AI traffic. However I've never had is cite that specific dynamic.dll before.

Just after takeoff from Frankfurt at night, I received an error message citing a problem in the file "dynamic.dll." I found it odd because although I've see the stupid FS error message about a million times before, I've never seen it cite dynamic.dll before. Can anyone shed any light on what the dynamic.dll file does and what could cause it to spit out an error message? I would appreciate any help.Thanks

Tom, thank you!I have provided me with a solution to one of the most annoying issues I've had with FS! I always tried extending the textures by copying and pasting a little more onto the end, but would have never thought to past on the opposite side!

Haha! So there's nothing that can fix it huh? Oh well. Thanks anyway for your help!

Has anyone else ever had this problem or could anyone tell me a solution:If you see the areas I've circled in red, there's a very noticeable crack running through the fuselage texture. This is not specific to the Project Fokker model or this paint, it happens on some other models and paints as well. Any help would be appreciated, thanks!P.S. I'm running a nVidia GeForce 9600GT 512MB with all the latest drivers, updating them didn't help.