yourpilot

i am using PFC boeing type yoke, controlled via fsuipc. i believe if the issue is sensitivity, i would have the prob with all planes maybe....but i will check it.(i use prosim A/P)

yes i agree, ifly has excellent flying characteristics, i am very satisfied as well.PMDG though matches better with Prosim737. (strange but autopilot seem to be unstable when flying with ifly, also engine trend indication does not match..)i am just a little dissapointed with Ariane, after being relatively expensive (to get only 1 model no liveries), and a really impossible activation system (i lost 1 evening) i though it would be absolutefantastic. but its not.

just checked the manuals etc the engines simulated are: (all are B737-800) ariane: CFM56-7B26 26400lb thrustpmdg: CFM56-7B26ifly: CFM56-7B26they seem to be the same model, so ariane seem to be out the norm. strange, they say they use Boeing data for their model...the reason why i decided to "investigate" is because of the extreme (compared to the other) power increase or decrease needed when changing attitude (leveling off or arresting descent)for ex with 65% N1, in the above mentioned conditions, plane will easily accelerate to 340kt (red tape) which seems unrealistic.

trying to find the best flying model for my homebuild flight similator....test flights at FL100, zero fuel mass=51000kgr fuel=10000kgr, comparison between the 3 addons.checking some original B737 training manuals, came up with the following : Config Airspeed Pitch N1 clean 250 4 65% clean 210 5 63% Flaps5 170 6 65%here is how each models behaves: PMDG 737ng clean 250 3 67% clean 210 5 63% Flaps5 170 6 65%Ifly 737ng clean 250 3 65% clean 210 6 60% Flaps5 170 6 64%Ariane v3.0 clean 250 3 48% clean 210 5 44% Flaps5 170 6 50%PMDG is the closest to the suggested values...Ariane has very strange engine values for a given attitude/speed.