Phadji

Yes, thats the scenary i am talking about. Anyway, i couldn't get it working so i dumbed it. I ll stick to EU scenary. Any ideas on anything value for money oriented ?

I google translated some parts of the pdf that was included but the translation is somewhat out of continuity. What you describe in the readme is from a different add on, and there is not such a translation in any of the 3 parts aeropuerto has. Although when after installation fs9 library updates, when i load an airport the default comes up. More worse when i put the installation scenary folders into add on fs9 folder it freezes. I don't know what else i could do, but your thought of steering away from it, comes closer...

Any reason why shouldn't i use it ? Manuals are all Spanish and i can't understand the language. Thanks

HiI just installed all 3 packages of aeropuerto mexico in fs9 but it seems not to be working. I create a flight at mmun or mnln but its just the default scenary. I noticed though, that all folder were installed at the main folder and not into scenary folder. When i tried to add it, fs just couldn't load it. Any ideas on how to make it work ?Thanks

Just nailed it...!Locked at 40fps constantly with all sliders at right. The same setup at fsx hit barely 5fps. I have to admit though that fsx scenary is better, but this is something that an add on would easily take care. If you have input please go aheadThanks again

Hi everybody. I am Paris from Greece and this is my first posting here, so be nice...I have an hp dv6 1260se (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 2,3Ghz) (Radeon HD 4650) 4gb DDR2 and i have currently installed fsx. Though, in order to have decent flights (30+fps) i have to move the sliders from medium and under. I wonder now, what the performance would be if i go down to FS9. My guess is that it would be night and day. It seems that those simulators are made to play best after a decade or by diving hard on our pockets...So should i go to FS9 or not ?Thanks