Jump to content

IAF747

The Dungeon
  • Content Count

    965
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by IAF747


  1. I worked out why the airliner flew west south west.

     

    It was to avoid flying over land of Thailand.

     

    I suspect this hijacking/theft of a 777 was extremely well planned.

     

    I believe that calculations would have been made to ensure the pirates/terrorists had enough fuel to go where they needed to go.

     

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/17/lawmaker-missing-airliner-may-have-landed-in-southeast-asia-for-use-as-weapon/

    I'd also love to know what the manifest was... but Malaysian have done well to keep flying. I know in my airline ops room. First thing we do in an incident is shut the systems down so data cannot be sent anywhere or manipulated. Second, quite simply you keep flying the programme sched as normal, otherwise your airline Is done. Malaysian have done both very well

     

    Agreed Rob.. decompression, either rapid or slow. Power to acars and satcomm goes off

     

     

    They descended to 10k as per driftdown erops (most people on here won't understand) and head to an era (enroute alternate) in order not to get a wet footprint. Oxygen fails in f/d for whatever reason, hypoxia sets In. Aircraft goes in the drink. Simple. You ask most qualified people. They will go for that.

     

    Add in the Malaysians don't want to admit their radars a bit cheap and crap, and the military's radar was asleep. (Come invade us). Add in boeing getting a bit worried the 777 needs grounding (alot of annoyed operators) so they spin some junk about a hijack.

     

    Bottom line, it's in the drink somewhere, I'm more worried about the 20000 Russian troops sitting on the Ukraine boarder and my impending next gas bill

     

    Malaysia doesn't have a cheap military. Well compared to NZ anyway....

     

    They have Sukhois, MiG29s, F/A-18s.....

     

    And US radar had problems picking up the hijacked A/C on 911 too..... Didn't they?


  2. Something isn't tracking well for me. It's been consistently reported that the last words transmitted from the cockpit were "Alright. Good night."

     

    What specifically was the conversation immediately proceeding those three words?

    ATC of Makaysia directing pilots to contact Vietnam ATC. Thus Goodnight. Normal as far as I am concerned.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/17/lawmaker-missing-airliner-may-have-landed-in-southeast-asia-for-use-as-weapon/

     

     

    Then this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/20/passengers-terrified-fires-lit-etihad-airways-flight-australia

     

    A fire could have been used to negotiate the pilots opening the cockpit door.


  3. Yes and I am in support of no fighter jets here, simply because New Zealand has a population of 4.5 Million so not enough population to support it. Money is better spent on Navy Ships, Helicopters and Anti-Submarine Aircraft.

     

    If we had to intercept something we do have two 757's, but they are not capable of shooting something down.

     

    Rarely I disagree with you Matty but I'm all out here!

     

    I think NZ needs to pull its own weight.

     

    I think some people totally miss the point with having an Air Force.

     

    If you leave it to Surface Ships without an Air Defence shield it's pretty lonely unless in an US Carrier Group.

     

    I think a few dozen fighters is about what NZ needs, not 500.

     

    Honestly Australia and NZ needs to boost its defence fighters by about 200-300. Traditionally we are ANZACs and that is a close relationship.

     

    It was devastating enough to have our boys sent in to battle in Gallipoli and get mowed down. We should be clever enough to prevent that from happening again.

     

    I don't get this peace thing where people think that by disarming we will reap peace. It works the opposite. Obama has been making cuts to Defence and Putin goes on the attack. All Obama will do is speak nicely to Putin! Let him take the whole Ukraine, I am sure after a few more like that it will remind many of ancient history when Chamberlain made a "peace in our time" deal with ######!

     

    I think younger voters in the US will be getting a good education on super power politics right about now....if they ever did....


  4. This thread is not about banning flight simulators. It is about MH370. If you desire go start a thread on banning flight simulators, but keep to the topic please in this thread.


  5. In New Zealand we have a very large area that extends over the South Pacific and cover the ATC all the way down to Antarctica, and we don't have any fighter jets.....not even one:

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_New_Zealand_military_aircraft

    Under a certain Goverment of NZ about 11 years ago during the Pakistani-Indian crisis NZ were offered a batch (21 I think) of F-16s from the US at a discount yet even then that particular Government refused to purchase.


  6.  

    That was one of my questions as well. According to this newspaper blog,...

     

    The plane did not take off with any additional fuel on board, other than what would be needed for a normal flight.

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/missing-malaysia-airlines-plane-live-3248148#ixzz2w80bza2u

    Other facts mentioned are interesting as well...

    • It was confirmed police have searched the homes of the pilot and co-pilot - removing a flight simulator from the pilot's house - but the two men did not ask to fly together on flight MH370.

    • It is possible that the last satellite signal received from the plane was sent when the plane was on the ground.

    • The authorities are asked if they will search, "one-by-one", the 600+ sites that have been identified as possible landing sites for the plane.

     

    Great post Greg.

     

    I'm sure the Spy Agencies of the super powers would be aware of this by now. I would have checked every possible land site by now. But saying this, hangars and camouflage may make it a somewhat difficult task.

     

    I would also wonder if a shorter runway or 'hidden runway' could have been used to totally evade S&R and the signals intelligence directorates of world Super Powers.

     

    North Korea apparently has a runway in a mountain for fighter aircraft.

     

    Iran I would say might be similar since they are mutual friends.

     

    Anything could be possible.


  7. I don't think that there will be a ban on flight simulation games. The truth is that a person can learn to fly any number of ways, in the RW as much as the PC world. Level D sims and such are out there for those who want to pay the money to fly them. And lesser full-on sims as well, but not full-motion.

     

    Truth is, if a person wants to do wrong, it's pretty hard to prevent it. You can try, you can gather intelligence, network, and so on, but if the individual is nutso, he or she can present problems, and not just with aircraft piracy.

     

    Defending a nation, or even just a simple city or town is no can of corn these days. My hat is off to those men and women who bust their tails on a daily basis so that we can live our lives in peace and safety. Our fine military, and our great law enforcement teams on the civilian side. Great job to one and all, and sincere thanks and appreciation!

    Great post Robert.

     

    Yes, I agree that I don't think there will be a ban either. The US can't (and shouldn't in my opinion) ban guns, so I doubt there will be a case for this unless it is in North Korea......

     

    I doubt the pilot is responsible here. I could be wrong though as their attitude at letting ladies in the cockpit dring flight shows their disrespect for the rules and law.

     

    There are a few agendas at play here and Malaysia is highly politically charged with internal affairs over the last decade.

     

    The fact that the Malayian Government wouldn't release information last week on the flight path known is suspious in itself. Why would it do this when other countries have committed resources to finding the airliner.

     

    I think the one possibility out of all the posible expanations of where MH370 is and how it got there that hasn't been looked at yet is the Malaysian Government.

     

    It is well known that the Government of Malaysia is not truthful. To me it sounds like the Opposition Leader was deliberately put in jail. Not getting into the politics, but that is one perspective I have been seriously thinking is a possibility in all this.

     

    The Malaysian Goverment in my opinion has mislead not only the media but foreign powers who have readily offered assistance in finding the 777.


  8. If it were a hijacking  than they would be flying very low  to avoid  the ground tracking radar of  the military of  which country they were crossing at the time, so one wonders if  the Malaysian military were in tracking it  in the first place  which they now  deny.  This disappearance is going to be  the biggest mystery of  all plane disasters.   

     

    As far as I know the aircraft has disappeared. There is no disaster yet, no confirmation.


  9. I see it this way....The cable company has a fleet of vehicles that are GPS tracked. And when the Cable Guy van has been found to be parked at a local strip club he loses his job because his employer can see that one of their vans has been parked out front on GPS tracking.

     

    My iPhone can be found when I lost it with a simple 'Find iPhone' app. But we can't find a $300 million dollar airliner?

     

    I agree these planes should be broadcasting more flight information back to the airlines that own them constantly.

     

     

    Yeah Matthew,

     

    I would say insurance companies are going to start pushing up their premiums. Like an alarm system for a car. No alarm? Higher cost!


  10. Great to see the A10s being used effectively. When a lot of baddies are there I think it is highly effective. Now Ukraine has come on the radar screen I believe the A10 should be kept. I change my mind! I I say what a Presidential nominee said before the last US Presidential election, Russia is No.1 priority........ and I'm not getting political.


  11. You really all have no clue,

     

    Tell me, how do you think, how easy it is to hijack a B777 nowdays, fly with it for many hours unspotted (even if transponder is off the radar will get primary target return) and then land somewhere. It's absolute bullsh*t, simply not possible.

     

    http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/malaysia-confirms-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370-was-hijacked/story-fnizu68q-1226855485378

    I've read commentary from telecom engineers that the ringing phones don't necessary mean anything.

     

    The whole thing is indeed very weird.

     

    CNN is now including links to FSX in their articles about the pilot:

     

    http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/14/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-pilot-profiles/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

     

     

    I just hope some nutter simmer isn't behind the hijacking, if it is a hijacking, like what happened in Japan once.

     

     

    Well:

    1. Iran has been threatening Western targets for years with their Suicide Brigades. http://www.meforum.org/1059/irans-suicide-brigades

    2. At least two unauthorized Iranians were on board the flight using stolen passports.

    3. The flight was headed towards Iran.

     

    To me its not far fetched that things are happening behind the scenes.

     

    If you are thinking some simmer is behind this you haven't been taking much notice of world events in the last few weeks, especially with Putin and the Crimea.

     

    Does ANYONE remember this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_8969

    Little did anyone say when the 911 attacks happened after a previous _________ refused to do ______ (no swear words just removing ______s from this thread).

    But if you look at the above it points to a very serious problem which I shouldn't talk about here as it so easily offends people and trolls just latch on to it.


  12. O RLY?  Simply not possible?  Before now, I would have thought it would be impossible for a commercial airliner to disappear for more than a week without a trace somewhere other than Alaska, but I've been proven wrong.  Ever heard of nap of the Earth flying?  Perhaps the aircraft simply left the radar operator's screen.  Radar has a range dictated by its power, and the curvature of the Earth, terrain, etc.  Even though you might act like it, I doubt you have any better idea than me of what happened.

     

    :Rolling Eyes:

     

     

    That's more like it.  :wink:

     

     

    I think some people cannot fathom limits of technology today. Yes we live in high tech world, but at the very least understand that technology has been designed with the user in mind, not with hijackers or criminals.

    Unbelievable is that the world media is running with this garbage. An "unnamed" official who claims to be part of the investigative team, who refused to give his name because he is not authorised to speak to the media, claims that he is 100% convinced it is a hijacking. no proof, no reasons, no logic. That is it.

     

    And the world media has gone into a frenzy.

     

    I just read an official at the press conference advise there is NO certainty in the hijacking theory, it is simply one of many theories being looked at. Nothing else.

     

    Truth is, until the aircraft is found, we will not know.

     

    Depends if the claims of family in China that they have been able to call the phones of loved ones is true or not. Lots and lots of information surrounding this disappearance and there may be a few agendas to deal with as well. Well it's a detectives special treat. I am not too phased by the drama, just let's get bare facts on the table. But of course spy agencies and military signals intelligence services worldwide would be doing it.

     

    It's not going to be fun having a large commercial airliner rigged with explosives aimed for a capital city. Even as Iran has previously threatened nuclear strike. Lots of possibilities here and if the aircraft is in the wrong hands militaries world wide would have to be on high alert until they recover the asset.


  13. Here's a flight path that they think it may have taken...

     

    http://airinfo.org/2014/03/14/disparition-du-vol-mh370-la-zone-de-recherche-etendue-a-locean-indien/

     

    and here's the google translation...

     

    http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://airinfo.org/2014/03/14/disparition-du-vol-mh370-la-zone-de-recherche-etendue-a-locean-indien/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://airinfo.org/2014/03/14/disparition-du-vol-mh370-la-zone-de-recherche-etendue-a-locean-indien/%26biw%3D1046%26bih%3D938

     

    and here's a text description of a route in text format that mentions the waypoints they think it was following...

     

    http://www.trust.org/item/20140314074853-wmctw

     

    Pure speculation, I know, but it's easy to imagine that the plane could have headed to Iran.

    I'm thinking like you Greg.

     

    If I was in CIA Sat intel HQ I would be checking latest sat images between Iran and Malaysia and within all countries in between.

     

    My instinct tells me if its not in the ocean it will be at an airport. But this is all based on information that may not be accurate.


  14. A little off topic, no? But since you brought it up, I really resent your opinion: I have been paying into Social Security as an "annuity" for almost 50 years, starting at age 12. If it were invested at a measly 4-percent it would be close to a million dollar nest-egg. To suggest that I am somehow "not worthy" of my annuity suggests that you are not really paying attention to or fully aware of what is going wrong in this country.

    It is off topic.

     

    Lets not go there.

    As much as the A10 is wonderful, there are not many large armies today that mass tanks similar to Egypt in 1973 on the Suez Canal. And not even Israel has the A10.

     

    I can see the A10 in the same stead as the F14, a Soviet era weapon.

    The A10 is a beautiful weapon when used against masses of rolling tanks and troops, and vehicles. That is World War Two vintage.

     

    Today's conflicts are UAVs, precision guided weapons to avoid civilian casualties.

     

    Not even in the Balkans has the A10 been needed in the last twenty years.

     

    The battlefield has changed and technology is changing.

     

    In Afghanistan even the tunnels and caves are proving to be challenging so I doubt the A10 could be effective there.


  15. ... is indicative of Mr. Joyce's approach to the business.

    I was there, and formed an opinion of him that will be difficult to shake.

    He represents the Ugly Face of Capitalism (tough Irish version) in its most naked form.

    There are other ways of streamlining an ailing business.

     

    Joyce.jpg

     

    (Used without permission)

    Kindly put it in context please:

     

    "After months of impasse, demands and industrial action, Mr Joyce took the extraordinary and unprecedented step of grounding the entire fleet of Qantas."

    AND:

    "His restructuring plan to make Qantas more competitive in the international market received near unanimous support from shareholders… The plans were the catalyst for two unions—the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (ALAEA) and the Transport Workers Union (TWU)—to implement rolling strikes this year. A third union, the Australian and International Pilots Association (AIPA), made unauthorized, in-flight announcements to vent their concerns…"

    EDIT:

    You say approach, it was response to the union's militancy. Whatever side you wish to blame, there was blatant evidence that staff were campaigning against reform when Alan Joyce saw the writing on the wall with Virgin's introduction of business class on the new Airbus A330-200s.

     

    Now the losses have hit and jobs must go. Simple. Not much else to say really.

     

    Apart from the unions campaign in 2010-2011. Virgin on the other hand could employ new staff far cheaper than QANTAS was paying theirs. Joyce knew who the winners were.

     

    You may be bitter for a few days of waiting or it may be that you never liked him anyway, but the fact is critics never offer any suggestions except like you said "could have done things differently". And what exactly is 'other ways of streamlining the business'?


  16. As far as I am aware, in the US and Asia, your possibility of getting near the cockpit, even on the ground, is 0%.

     

    If AF is 'opening the door' so to speak, US authorities, especially Homeland Security, the USAF, FBI and ATC will be very interested to know this for AF flights in and out of the continental United States.

     

    Please remember countries in Asia have the death penalty for importing drugs and they deal with terrorism quickly and punish severely. People forget how sensitive security is in Asia and it wasn't them that was hit in 911 but they know better like some countries in the a Middle East through experience.

     

    You rarely hear it in the news but if you go looking you will find plenty of information about the response of countries into security situations.

     

    France and especially AF have also similar security measures from their recent experiences. I am surprised they allow cockpit visits at all.


  17. "Mr Abbott called on Labor to help give the airline some “legislative help” by repealing the carbon tax."

     

    http://www.perthnow.com.au/travel/travel-news/tony-abbott-against-debt-guarantee-for-qantas-after-5000-jobs-axed/story-fnjjv9zm-1226839057297

     

    I think Alan Joyce is the only option anyway. Unless the Government really wants to slash and burn......

     

    I doubt Alan is to blame. A few years ago he tried do something and the unions were adamant at stopping him.

     

    http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/what_qantas_needs_now_and_it_isnt_more_bloody_minded_unions/

    "

     

    What Qantas needs now, and it isn’t more bloody-minded unions

    Andrew Bolt

    FEBRUARY

    27

    2014

    (8:11am)

    Terry McCrann:

     

     

    QANTAS needs both things it is asking the Government for — a debt guarantee and the freedom to copy Virgin Australia in seeking major foreign shareholders.

     

    The results from Qantas today are also going to show with brutal clarity that even with that help, it will still face a fundamental struggle to survive…

     

    Now, there’s an important qualification to government help. The debt guarantee should operate in a strictly limited way — just to bridge the gap to the repeal of the Qantas shareholder restrictions.

     

    Once Qantas is able to get major foreign shareholders, as does Virgin, it would be completely inappropriate for that company to continue to be guaranteed by the taxpayer.

     

    Of course, all that is in the hands of the uncertain Senate after June.

     

    McCrann is right to challenge the critics of Qantas CEO Alan Joyce to come up with an alternative plan that did not involve falling market share, increasing losses and fewer jobs.

     

    How stupid does that damaging 2011 industrial dispute look now? How many of the unionists today losing their jobs fought three years ago against the cost cutting the airline clearly needed?:

     

     

    When independent arbitrator Fair Work Australia invoked national interest in terminating all industrial action between Qantas and striking aviation unions at 2 a.m. Monday, it brought an end all industrial action in a bitter dispute that has dragged on for 14 months…

     

    Make no mistake: this was an industrial war that struck at the heart of nationalism, protectionism and old-school political divides…

     

    The long-running labor dispute at the world’s second-oldest airline reached its boiling point during the Qantas Annual General Meeting on Friday, October 28.

     

    Chief executive Alan Joyce ... accused the unions of “slowly crippling our business and trashing our brand."…

     

    His restructuring plan to make Qantas more competitive in the international market received near unanimous support from shareholders… The plans were the catalyst for two unions—the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (ALAEA) and the Transport Workers Union (TWU)—to implement rolling strikes this year. A third union, the Australian and International Pilots Association (AIPA), made unauthorized, in-flight announcements to vent their concerns…

     

    With the ongoing dispute already costing Qantas $70 million, Joyce threatened an employee lockout, and promised to ground the airline at a cost of $20 million a day by way of forcing the government’s hand in ordering arbitration.

     

    This is exactly what happened.

     

    "

     

     

    Alan Joyce had that shutdown in Oct 2011, remember?

     

    Well he said QANTAS should focus on Virgin and the unions were giving Virgin a free kick. How right he was.

     

    http://www.news.com.au/finance/crunch-time-qantas-ceo-faces-shareholders-and-unions-at-agm/story-e6frfm1i-1226179319256

    Be interesting to see how this plays out; the Qantas customer base, and personnel, are strongly connected it seems through social media.

    Last night I (and presumably the other 10 million Frequent Flyers) got a wheedling email from CEO Qantas Loyalty, Leslie Grant.

    In part, it goes:

    I have received many questions both directly and through social media and wanted to reach out to you personally as a valued member. whitespacer.jpg These are tough but necessary measures to ensure a strong future for Qantas and our nearly 10 million Qantas Frequent Flyer members. whitespacer.jpg Let me assure you, however, that these measures will not impact your Qantas Points balance or cause your Qantas Points to expire.

     

    This sounds a little desperate to me! So I emailed in return (imagine if just 1% of the 10 million did):

    Thanks Lesley,

    By now you will have realised what Alan is about to do to Qantas.

    I shan’t be troubling you any more, I have serious doubt about flying an airline whose workforce is disgruntled, on reliability and safety grounds.

    Please remove me from your FF Programme, and remove me from your mailing list.

     

    Be interesting to see if Alan Joyce makes it to the end of the month...

     

    "

    Today’s hardships aren’t new for the divisive Alan Joyce. Mr Joyce dominated headlines in October 2011 when Qantas management was embroiled in a bruising battle with the unions.

    After months of impasse, demands and industrial action, Mr Joyce took the extraordinary and unprecedented step of grounding the entire fleet of Qantas.

    In all, hundreds of flights were cancelled all over the world, leaving tens of thousands of passengers stranded from Melbourne to Helsinki. He also locked out all striking staff members.

    Three days later, Qantas and the unions were hauled before Fair Work Australia which ordered all industrial action cease. The whole exercise cost Qantas $70 million.

    Some called Mr Joyce’s decision bold while others accused him of recklessly endangering the Australian economy. The legacy of that decision is still being debated with detractors and supporters of Mr Joyce’s strategy continuously slugging it out.

    "

     

    http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/the-worst-work-days-for-bosses-of-qantas-bp-jp-morgan-chase-nine-and-the-nrl/story-fn5tas5k-1226839326474


  18. I haven't seen this decline in living standards......even Japan which suffered deflation for 6 years, they have one of the highest living standards in the world! Even their toilet seats are heated!!! Their food quality is still very high....so it is illogical to say living standards have decreased. [The cost of living has decreased except for those using green energy.......]

    It's called change and its about competition, not declining living standards. Products have got cheaper in line with lower wages and costs. And services. It's called competition.........


  19. Kevin the circle of death is your catch phrase. The fact is Australia does very well and so does the USA when unions are not allowed to hold companies to ransom.

     

    SPC, Toyota, Ford, Holden, QANTAS, the building industry.....the list goes on and on. All killed by unions causing their employees to be way overpaid for the job they do and extremely generous conditions!

     

    Think about that rather than your circle of death. In fact, the circle of death is union POWER! Nothing else.

     

    When the unions were taken out of the equation in NW WA the mining industry took off. Little wonder. It is basic economics and industrial relations. And wages skyrocketed once unions were cast aside....it is market based. Demand and supply. If you go to a communist system where everything is controlled by a central agency (the state) then as well as being extremely inefficient there is no investment or development because investors are unable to operate under state owned rules.


  20. Do what Rio Tinto did.

    Sack the lot of them and make them re-apply for their jobs, giving QANTAS a chance to restructure without unions.....

    If they get this done now then they will be ale to grow later because the playing field is more even.

     

    Though Rio was fed up with unions for striking over pink icecrem.......

    But a train driver earns around $200K now, no unions!

     

    On the radio 2GB today there was talk of managers of QANTAS (1500 of them!!) giving themselves reviews, justifying their positions. What a waste, all a culture of bureaucracy from Government days where there was a position merely created by another bureaucrat and not justified.

     

    And flight attendants being paid $120K a year on QANTAS while VA, SQ and EK all are under $50K. I thought VA FAs were only on $38K a year and thats including OT. This was all on 2GB today, Ray Hadley and Chris Smith. Steve Price also.

×
×
  • Create New...