c172SPII

From a professional stand point: it is absolutely incomprehensible that a company like LM does not want to disclose (not even towards its professional licensees) the information which PC system (eg. brand, type, etc) their are using to verify - annex certify - their product on so it is working correctly as intended for its customers (or at least at what settings). Sadly I have seen this happening at other software companies too... I think a community like this would gratefully benefit from this simple information (left alone the many that like to have/tweak their own system built and use add-ons). At least, you have a proper concrete reference then... A great deal of fellow members here would rather be using the product than trying to get it run (properly) ;-), no?

Hi, I want to get a prop animation in my 2D outside view (I use a hardware cockpit with 3 screens). I want to accomplish something similar like in these Redibird sims I see on the net. They have several screens, but also a bit of engine cowling and the prop animation on the center screen. I mainly use the A2A model, and an modified FSX model. Can anybody tell how to, help or assist me in this. Tnx!

Hi, I have installed the Belgium 2012 package in Prepar3d which I use for VFR training. It is working very well. However installed the autogen V1 package (which already included in the "enhancement" I guess, I know it was not tested for p3d) but nothing is appearing at all. When I slide the autogen density slider to 100%, I see some buildings popping up, but not at all in correct places (more like the standard unrealistic default autogen). Trying to figure if there is a difference in autogen methodology between fsx and prepar3d (not sure), am I doing something wrong here? Photoscenery is fantastic and a big step forward for training when vfr at 1500ft but becomes unusefull at lower alts because of bluring; then standard scenery with autogen is more useful. so any input, experience or so very welcome Regards, Martin ps: sorry if this might already be touched in another topic, but have not found it.