Deleted

It is.

i know here on vatsim see all msfs as the super simulator. 

I have problems with msfs all the time and the most people too. That's a fact

That will not change with Fenix.

Just waiting for Xplane12

Unfortunately, Fenix no longer shares progress. Unfortunately, the team always announced news in advance, and the dates were always far behind.

A lot of simmers have been a bit upset about this and as a result there has been no more news.

Fenix failed to change strategy by first completing the news and only then making an announcement.

Today I am not sure if I will buy the Fenix.I'm missing a bit of customer-related stuff here.

Because I don't want an add-on by a Team like Fenix that don't work together with the simmers.

15 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

I don’t know anymore than you Kev. Suggest you install Ad Blocker Plus which removes all ads.

Ad Blocker Plus I have. That's why it's just white. It still affects the use of the site.

It's very annoying on mobile Chrome. I can see that I have messages but cannot click on them because it is hidden.

No information to the roadmap? Is Fenix already in the BETA?

yes, when many peoples are online, it makes so much fun. Unfortunately, vatsim and ivao share users, which reduces the fun. 

starting in 15 min www.twitch.tv/fenixsimulations

https://ibb.co/5F7Mkbk

Start at 6pm BST

18 minutes ago, Carts85 said:

I’ve been trying to work out the release myself based on what we’ve seen so far. Aamir mentioned the flight model needs some work still to get it to that accurate level they want.. the systems we’ve seen so far look incredibly far along already, seems the alpha team are bug reporting so I wonder if there is many features missing at this point… I think end of sept mid/ November but obviously purely speculating here.

pmdg is a competitor and the 737 is coming soon. If the Fenix is released soon, he would have to give a date because of pmdg. At least if it comes in the next few months.

This is my thought.

It's a shame that there is still no date. I would like to know if it is another year, 6 months or even weeks. 

4 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

Everyone I know that has had a house built for them got used to being told, " It will be finished in two more weeks". Rinse and repeat. 

But it makes a big difference whether I give an exact date, a quarter, or no date at all.

By the way, One of them asked for the release date on the discord. I replied that they have one but will not reveal one to harm psychology. I was immediately kicked out of the discord 🤣

12 minutes ago, Matchstick said:

By the same token, everyone stating this is the "greatest thing ever" are also talking about a product that hasn't been released yet.

Right now we have a few screenshots and few comments from dev, testers and a very limitted selection of other people.

 

I hope this module does live up to the descriptions we've been given but right now NONE of us know if it will or not.

It is indeed shameful that this type of advertising only giving out very small amounts of information to the customers in order to drive them crazy and start a hype. For example, nobody has to tell me that the developers don't have a schedule. 

Imagine I have the same thing when I build a house. Disaster 🤣

https://imgur.com/aSLNnKf

I deleted the IVAO model matching and have now the default mode. But then i see the planes like in this picture. Ldg Gear lights are vertical. And other lights are off. Not all, but nearly all ones.

9 minutes ago, vcarlo said:

Sorry, not sure what is causing your issues.  I always see VATSIM traffic via the beacon and strobe lights.  Are you using vPilot and the default model matching enabled ? My settings are pretty much default for everything on vPilot.

No i use the IVAO model matching. But maybe this could be the problem.

Are you able to see the traffic due the night? I cant see them, maybe because the lights of them are off i think.

If you could see them, please tell me how to solve it.

One minute searching could help you faster

41 minutes ago, Bosco19 said:

I spent years flying around at 1000 feet in a slow Experimental home-built, in high-and-dry Southwest U.S. where visibility is commonly a hundred miles. Even in this environment, you really don't have razor-sharp object definition at longer distances. Definition diminishes pretty rapidly with distance (especially with my mediocre vision!). I get the impression that a lot of simmers expect a level of sharpness that coincides more with our present day exposure to high-def TV's and monitors, rather than the level of definition that would be available in the RW. I might have been able to say that I could see that, 3 miles out there was a colorful string of laundry hanging in someone's back yard, but I would probably have to be almost directly above it to tell you whether it was a shirt or a dress hanging there. Of course a lot depends on your personal ability to see detail in the RW. Chuck Yeager was famous for his ability to see opposing aircraft long before his wing mates did (lucky him).

Yes, one problem that many have is that they zoom in fully. But without binoculars 

MS and asobo should have involved a team like FSlabs in the project from the start. FSlabs knows exactly what the community can expect.

If they had done that, and an FSlabs Airbus was there from the start, nobody would talk about other simulations today. 

The SDK would probably also have become much more extensive. 

Ist this program compatible to vatsim?

Any news for Vatsim now? Especially modelmatching (liveries) and weather?

One Question to this Addon:

Are the correctly gates in there by starting a new flight? The default one is absolutely false (terrible for vatsim)

the FBW team is amazing. I hope it won't be a long time the flight plan manager and calculated TOD works properly. 

I want to fly it on vatsim. Now! 😜

My big problem is this large pixelation of the ground from an altitude of 15000 ft. It looks worse than xplane.

On ultra of course

We airliners simply have to wait another 1-2 years. It's a pity, but it's too early for msfs.