Jump to content

alternatelaw2

Members
  • Content Count

    17
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by alternatelaw2

  1. Make a video on it/detailed review post. I saw it online and was concerned by the lack of reviews. It is important you do so to warn others of what appears to be a scam. I saw your crosspost on flightsim.com. Just send it back and get your money back regardless. on/off outputs are defective imo even if its designed like that. Garbage.
  2. What's a good technique for producing realistic-looking backlit glass textures for airport buildings (night time)? I was looking at facades on the web but they have inappropriate interiors (offices etc.) And the panes don't match mine. I can't work out how the pros do it.
  3. Hi there. I am trying to get hold of a Ryanair FCOM/QRH/SOP manual. I managed to download the 2005 revision from mycockpit.org but find the ''not for operational use'' (strewn across the whole page) watermark rather annoying. I do not mind if it is 10+ years old or a pdf/physical copy. I do not mind if it has ''not for operational use'' written on it. As long as the watermark doesn't cover the whole page that's fine by me. I would appreciate it if somebody could point me in the right direction, be it via a reply or via a PM.
  4. Saw this. Very strange: Accidental? https://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/tv-and-home-entertainment/gaming/console-games/xbox-one-flight-simulator-10194007-pdt.html
  5. Want default aircraft that are easily modifiable. This is so that we can have a Zibo-style mod for the default aircraft. If you don't know what I mean by this, check this out: https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/138974-b737-800x-zibo-mod-info-installation-download-links/
  6. Superb answers. Thank you for your time! Much appreciated.
  7. I have decided that I would like to switch to the BAW (cirrus) specific OFP format on simbrief to change things up a little. I was hoping that you could help me to decipher everything highlighted in yellow. For some context: LFOT is my C1 alternate for this test flight. When replying, reference the number above the image (not the OFP page number) and then the queried data. I have also attached the standard LIDO equivalent to help. I know what things like ATD are but have highlighted the whole line because the order of presentation is odd. I also suspect that PL is the passenger load (113 PAX * 100kg?) As always, any help is appreciated. 1. 2. LIDO.pdf
  8. @iwebber @Captain Kevin Somebody also responded to my question on another forum and these are the extras that they got: 1c. The waypoint at which you will have the highest shear value along your route, in this case TNT. SimBrief defines shear as: "Higher values of this number indicate an increased risk of Clear Air Turbulence". It's essentially a representation of how much the wind varies per 1000ft of altitude at a given waypoint. 2a. CNR = Company Normal Reserves. Essentially FINRES (Final Reserve) + ALTN fuel, i.e. the lowest amount of fuel you should legally have over your destination before diverting. This value is always rounded up, so if FINRES + ALTN = 2801 (as it does in this case), it's still rounded up to 2.9. 2b. FOD = Fuel over destination. i.e. the planned FOB on landing. 5a. SR = Shear value over each waypoint (see 1c above).
  9. Thank you for both of your responses. I really appreciate it. To help me translate the EZY format, I also published a the flightplan in classic LIDO format at the same time. To @iwebber here are my findings based on what you have suggested: The numbers show that it is likely TRIP + FINRES = (3.332) This appears to be the more appropriate deduction. I checked the TAFs for all of the aerodromes and the figure on the left appeared to be the lowest possible forecasted cloud base. The number on the right was the worst forecasted visibility for the appropriate arrival times. EGCC/MAN MANCHESTER SA 061850 AUTO VRB02KT 9999 BKN013 OVC034 06/05 Q0998 TEMPO SCT013 FT 061659 0618/0724 08005KT 9999 SCT030 TEMPO 0618/0702 8000 -RA BKN012 PROB40 TEMPO 0618/0702 BKN008 TEMPO 0702/0715 4000 RA BKN008 TEMPO 0715/0724 8000 -RA BKN012 PROB40 TEMPO 0715/0724 4000 RA BKN008 This would appear to be correct too based on the LIDO plan Based on these findings I must say that I really like the EZY format. The alternate page and weather page is really nice.
  10. I have decided that I would like to switch to the LIDO EZY specific OFP format on simbrief to change things up a little. I was hoping that you could help me to decipher everything highlighted in yellow. For some context: EGCC is my C1 alternate for this test flight. When replying, reference the number above the image (not the OFP page number) and then the queried data. As always, any help is appreciated. 1 2 3 4 5
  11. I want a functional default weather radar that has tilt, gain etc and can be used by 3rd party developers for their aircraft
  12. @Baber20 they already showed this in #1 at 2:28 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZL5PCZO8cc
  13. Ah I'm pretty gutted that I never heard anything. I'm a dev and a real world pilot so no idea as to what they were looking for.
  14. II want the ability to conduct an external inspection of the aircraft in first person. P3d has implemented something similar but unfortunately it is in 3rd person.
  15. Freeware scenery developer (XPlane): 1. A large library of HQ stock objects so that we can make convincing lego-brick airports. If the XPlane Gateway model is then adopted, lego-brick airports could be submitted to mods and approved/rejected. These could then be shipped with the latest update without the need for users to download additional libraries. This also ensures that default airports are HQ and up to date (with ground markings/taxiway changes...). It would be a shame if such a beautiful sim were to be ruined by poor vanilla airports. 2. The ability to get information about the terrain mesh in the scenery development programme used to create overlays. In XPlane, it is frustrating to make a custom building, only for it to sink into the ground because you have no information on local elevation fluctuations whilst in the scenery tool.
  16. TL;DR: Can MSFS come with its own scenery gateway like XPlane? I am a freeware XPlane scenery developer. I have never made an airport for Microsoft ESP before so I have no clue as to how you folk do things on your side. In XPlane, we have a scenery gateway (see: https://gateway.x-plane.com/). The logic behind the site is as follows: 1. Users use Laminar Research's assets to make airports 2. These are then uploaded to the Gateway and checked by appointed moderators 3. Moderators give feedback and either approve/reject the user submission 4. If approved of, the scenery is then shipped with the latest XPlane update. This ensures that the scenerys can be updated and that the default airports are constantly improving. As a result, the XPlane ships with some superb default airports. I would like to note that these are independent of freeware airports that can be found on any other websites as the Gateway ones purely use Laminar's assets.
×
×
  • Create New...