The mistake we often make is to compare the screenshots of FS2020 with screenshots of FSX and or P3DV4.5 inflated by all the wonderful add-ons that
we are happy to have in our scenario library.
Add-ons in the end quite expensive, essential for realism, but which have gradually enriched our simu for 13 years !!
Concerning St Barth I realized this island as well as Guadeloupe in free for P3DV4.
https://www.rikoooo.com/downloads/viewdownload/68/924
For St Barth the mesh is 5 m and it is the most precise available to date.
it is therefore better than that of FlyTampa, the photo texture is also much better because of 50 cm and I can make one of 20 cm because all this data
is free, thanks to the open data that European Union(UE)has set up which means that a lot of previously paid French data is now free.
In short for FS2020 what is missing on St Barth is a mesh more precise than that which apparently is currently offered (pre-alpha) and less ubiquitous
and bulky vegetation.
In any case, despite everything, well done for the representation of the rock, it is sublime and to represent it like that is that, there is already
good data, not to mention the resolution of textures in land class really very immersive, but maybe it's also satellite photos, there is not enough
visualization to know.
But it has nothing to do with FSX!
https://goopics.net/a/XSiesHMo
For my realization I did not integrate a FSX-P3V4 track like that we can really appreciate the real slope and the good difference in altitude between
the passage of the "Col de la tourmente" and the threshold of track 10.
I also left compatibility with the FlyTampa scene by deactivating or activating certain files!
and there you have the live!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5pr9vOC5ok
The mistake we often make is to compare the screenshots of FS2020 with screenshots of FSX and or P3DV4.5 inflated by all the wonderful add-ons that we are happy to have in our scenario library. Add-ons in the end quite expensive, essential for realism, but which have gradually enriched our simu for 13 years !! Concerning St Barth I realized this island as well as Guadeloupe in free for P3DV4. https://www.rikoooo.com/downloads/viewdownload/68/924 For St Barth the mesh is 5 m and it is the most precise available to date. it is therefore better than that of FlyTampa, the photo texture is also much better because of 50 cm and I can make one of 20 cm because all this data is free, thanks to the open data that European Union(UE)has set up which means that a lot of previously paid French data is now free. In short for FS2020 what is missing on St Barth is a mesh more precise than that which apparently is currently offered (pre-alpha) and less ubiquitous and bulky vegetation. In any case, despite everything, well done for the representation of the rock, it is sublime and to represent it like that is that, there is already good data, not to mention the resolution of textures in land class really very immersive, but maybe it's also satellite photos, there is not enough visualization to know. But it has nothing to do with FSX! https://goopics.net/a/XSiesHMo For my realization I did not integrate a FSX-P3V4 track like that we can really appreciate the real slope and the good difference in altitude between the passage of the "Col de la tourmente" and the threshold of track 10. I also left compatibility with the FlyTampa scene by deactivating or activating certain files! and there you have the live! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5pr9vOC5ok
