Jump to content

kingie

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Reputation

1 Neutral

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. If Simbrief's intention was to have the radio callsign in the callsign box would their description not be different than: To me the above sounds like Simbrief caters for airlines with a difference between Flightnumber and Callsign (7839 vs 78VA). Otherwise it wouldn't be a combination of Airline + flightnumber in the callsign box.
  2. Firstly great work on keeping the regular updates / fixes coming! I had a read through the recent changelogs and stumbled upon the updated callsign logic. To my understanding it seems like this logic isn't 100% correct (or maybe I am misunderstanding Simbrief and happy to be corrected!). If I have the following flight: U2 7839 // EJU 78VA (easyJet Europe flight 7839) I fill in Simbrief flightplan as follows: Airline: U2 Flight number: 7839 Callsign: EJU78VA But according to the 7E logic this would result in the following P2A callsign: U2 7839. Shouldn't logic be: If callsign is available shouldn't it always take that field as priority? So first 3 characters as Airline lookup code and the rest as flight / tail number in P2A?
  3. I've set this up as well and I agree it does sound a lot better than the default Microsoft TTS. I was doing a flight earlier and the Polly voices I had configured just stopped working suddenly.
×
×
  • Create New...