kingie

If Simbrief's intention was to have the radio callsign in the callsign box would their description not be different than: To me the above sounds like Simbrief caters for airlines with a difference between Flightnumber and Callsign (7839 vs 78VA). Otherwise it wouldn't be a combination of Airline + flightnumber in the callsign box.

Firstly great work on keeping the regular updates / fixes coming! I had a read through the recent changelogs and stumbled upon the updated callsign logic. To my understanding it seems like this logic isn't 100% correct (or maybe I am misunderstanding Simbrief and happy to be corrected!). If I have the following flight: U2 7839 // EJU 78VA (easyJet Europe flight 7839) I fill in Simbrief flightplan as follows: Airline: U2 Flight number: 7839 Callsign: EJU78VA But according to the 7E logic this would result in the following P2A callsign: U2 7839. Shouldn't logic be: If callsign is available shouldn't it always take that field as priority? So first 3 characters as Airline lookup code and the rest as flight / tail number in P2A?

I've set this up as well and I agree it does sound a lot better than the default Microsoft TTS. I was doing a flight earlier and the Polly voices I had configured just stopped working suddenly.