November 8, 200223 yr Just curious. I have learned to be careful with screenshots posted by the developer as you sometimes can be fooled as to what it really looks like once it's on your monitor. I love the plane and I hope the VC is as good as the 260 and DF Archer. I was really disappointed with the Seneca and have tried to get a refund but still no response. I never used to be a VC fan but after using a good one for a while, you dont go back. The 260 and archer have the low-profile 2d which I like to use on final, but thats the only time I will utilize it. Just keeping my fingers crossed. Their email said the VC is excellent. I just hope they were comparing theirs to the two mentioned above.RegardsBobG
November 9, 200223 yr Hi Bob yes i agree with u completely on the FSD Sececsa as i too would like a refund but no luck so far. what i can recommend is the Reggio Calabria scenery recently put out by Lago. It is really really good with excellent frame rates and an approach that can only be rivalled by the famous Kai Tak approach. the only problem I have wioth it is that the ILS is not working but hopefully that will be corrected soon- other than that it is easily on of the best sceneries i have downloaded.
November 9, 200223 yr Thank you for the recommendation. Let me know if you have any luck on the refund :-)RegardsBob Ginn
November 9, 200223 yr Author Looked at the screenshots - I wasn't that impressed. Doesn't look like cutting edge technology. But it is always possible real thing will be better.Michael J. Michael J.
Create an account or sign in to comment