November 14, 200619 yr Sorry if this has been posted before. . . just saw this this morning from Tom's Hardware.http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/11/14/intel_an...own_processors/
November 14, 200619 yr No. FSX barely takes advantage of two cores. The two extra cores would just sit there fat, dumb and happy.Gary 9800X3D | 4090 | 64GB | 2+1TB NVME | 2TB SSD | 2TB HDD | 85/50/43” TVs | Quest 3 | DOF H3 Motion Rig | Buttkicker | T.16000M Flight Kit MSFS @ 4K Ultra DLSS Performance FG 80 FPS | VR VDXR Godlike 80Hz SSW | MSFS VR DLSS Quality, Ultra Preset - Windows 11 Acer Nitro 5 | i5-11400H | RTX 3060 6 GB | 32GB DDR4 | 15.6" FHD IPS 144Hz | 2 x 512 GB SSD | Windows 11
November 14, 200619 yr Gary,You beat me to it! Glenn Ryzen 3700X, X570 Pro Wifi, 32GB 3600mhz RAM, Nvidia Titan Xp "Galactic Empire", RM750x PSU, H700 case, 2x NVMe M2 SSD, 1x SATA SSD
November 14, 200619 yr Which begs the question. "Just what hardware did the ACES team anticipate in their design choices for FSX?"Seems like if they were `knowing`, then it ought to be at least around in early test form by now, but the future is dual and quad core as best I can see.And if they were `guessing` then I wouldn't suggest taking any horse racing tips from these guys! They probably don't get coin flipping right very often either.Looks like they got it soooooo very wrong that there is NOTHING in the market now - or in the forseeable future - that will actually let FSX stretch its legs. When even the dogs doo-daas of digital graphical representation gives an increase of just 5fps someone right at the heart of the program needs to answer for these development decisions that have left consumers unable to consume. You can't suck a roast dinner through a straw.Allcott
Create an account or sign in to comment