What conclusion from this 3850 test with FSX

I found at Toms Hardware this test over a 3850 AGP videocard and also with FSX. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ati-ag...0-agp,1939.htmlFor me it was very interesting since I have a similary CPU and a 6600GT which was also used in the test. But there are some differences from what would apply for me1) They used VISTA2) They used FSX with no AA3) They had 2 Gb RAMI would like to know what conclusions could be drawn for this regarding FS9 instead of FSX and with 4*AA and also with Win XP instead of Vista and with 1 Gb RAM instead of 2 Gb. Is FS9 equally CPU intensive as FSX?In the test you see the 6600GT clearly weaker in other games but in FSX the difference is much less pronounced.My systemAMD 64 3200+1 Gb 400 MHz RAMNIVIDIA 6600GT 256M DDR3Win XP Home