jfri

When I enter settings/controls I check the settings that are active. I tried creating a P51 specific profile but that failed. Control Settings are mess and very unintuive

Exactly what I did also EDIT I found out that here is now two versions so I loaded the new GPS version. Still my original problem remains. TM Hotas assigned prop lever also set the equal amount of throttle. And a lever on the CH Throttle quadrant also controls the prop although not being assigned to prop control

I do have the mod folder directly under community and I see manifest/layout straight away when opening the modfolder in the community folder

But how do you use it ? I placed the extracted folder in the community folder but that didn't work

I also tried the P51 in MSFS2024 and my settings does not make sense for it. When I move the propeller assigned lever (TM Hotas Warthog) the throttle also move. One lever on my CH throttle quadrant also controls the propeller. But that axis is not assigned to anything according to search by input

I have now tested with some planes with zero crosswind. It seem payware single prop planes at least get the left turning tendency direction correct (JF Piper PA28 Anthony AN-2 Sting ) the default C172 went almost straight with a very small left tendency. So it seem crosswing first played a role Question is how much right rudder should we need to apply in order to get it realistic ? In X Plane very much is needed almost full rudder input.

Will Asobo fix this unrealistic behaviour ? MSFS is supposed to be as real as it get

I have discovered that on takeoff with C172 the plane tends to turn slightly to the right so I need to apply slight left rudder. In other sims like X Plane it is the opposite. C172 plane turns to the left and I need a significant amount of right rudder to stay on the centerline. Same thing in P3D with A2A Cherokee. I think the latter is the correct and realistic behaviour right ?

Which were these two headsets ?

Actually they still do. I found this https://pimax.com/products/pimax-crystal-light-free-honsvr-prescription-lenses-bundle?_pos=1&_psq=prescription&_ss=e&_v=1.0

From what I could see Pimax don't sell lenses for Crystal Light

I am also looking for a new headset since my HP Reverb G2 has failed. I have had very long sessions with AI about the best choice and also watched many reviews and comparisons. Now it seem best to wait for Steam Frame. I was close to order a Crystal Light since it seem clearly best with regard to display. But I found out that I would need prescription lenses which is complcated and must be purchased from external dealers. Also the aspheric lens is more sensitive to variations than pancake lenses. From what I can see Dream Air is far more expensive than Crystal Light

Yes no doubt Grok AI can be wrong. First I pointed out that it make no sense that the risk should be higher for a replacement unit. Then I wrote that I found its risk estimate unlikely high. Then first it admitted that my first point was correct. Then it changed its risk estimate to 10-20% but repeat that Google AI numbers 5-8 % is too low

It's actually Grok AI that raised the concerns. It claims that there is a 15-30% risk of getting a unit with noticable problem and then 25-45% for the replacement unit to be flawed. The question is should I be concerned ? Another problem is that the alternative headsets (Quest 3 and Steam Frame) also concerns me in some ways

From what I understand it those glas linses are more sensitive to variations that can introduce errors. So it is unavoidable to get a higher risk for misadjustment of the lenses or minor variation in their form. But I do think the higher estimates are clearly exagerated. Still even 5% feels unconfortable for me. In addition to the risk of getting a flawed headset there is also the aspect of the headset being more fragile because of the heavy glas linses. For example once my HP Reverb G2 fell to the floor but still worked. With a PCL I suspect this would be more serious.