Jump to content

btacon

Members
  • Content Count

    2,059
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,807 Excellent

About btacon

  • Rank
    Member - 2,000+

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

10,209 profile views
  1. Bad memories from a time past. Money NOT well spent either. -B
  2. Why don’t you remove Orbx NZ Mesh for a few days and check it out for yourself? -B
  3. The only crisis that I see exists entirely in your mind. Take a deep breath, relax and enjoy the sim as it exists today. Never been better IMO and MSFS 2024 looks to be another leap in functionality and performance. All good things take time. -B
  4. No misunderstanding. He states unequivocally May 7th. Thanks for finding that -B
  5. Try Alt-Enter. After one good session it should stick I think -B
  6. No offense taken. Not quite sure of your question though. You state you have the 700 for MSFS already and if you are asking if there is advantage to the other three (600,800,900) I would say no. They are all functionally identical with Features and Functions so if that is your question I would say no reason other than a desire to possess more 😎. -B
  7. My guess? From my recollection the Duke is slated to use some SU15 features. Can’t release until SU15 is in production. The PA-38? Not so much I believe so no issue releasing mid flight SU15 so to speak. YMMV. TANSTAAFL -B
  8. While that may be your opinion I challenge your statement with four PMDG 737s in service, each as robust and feature filled as the ones modeled for P3d. Add to it the Fenix a320 and a myriad of default aircraft now with more features and advanced avionics than in any previous sim, the Longitude and the 787 and 747 come quickly to mind. This ain’t yer grandfathers MSFS and to declare it as only for VFR and “Eye Candy” can be viewed as quite short sighted, bordering on disingenuous. My Opinion only but an opinion of someone who owns both MSFS 2020 AND P3D Ver 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and now 6.0 -B
  9. Mine can be locked. Title says it all and I have no attachment to this particular thread. -B
  10. From the horses mouth (Product Page) -B The Tomahawk has a real-world reputation for being very susceptible to entering spins. We have included this behaviour in this simulation of the Tomahawk, To enter a spin, reach a safe altitude and reduce the throttle to idle. Pitch the nose up to bleed off airspeed until the stall warning horn sounds. Just before the stall occurs, apply full left rudder to enter the spin. Once established in the spin, release pressure on all controls and the aircraft will remain in a spin until pilot input is applied. To exit a spin, apply a rudder input opposite to the direction of the spin and push the nose down. Reduce the throttle to idle and once the aicraft exits the spin, pull the nose up gently to return to straight and level flight. Trty not to exceed the aircraft’s VNE (never exceed speed) or G-limits when pulling out of the dive.
  11. Just got the email announcement. Going to get me a copy, maybe you might too? https://www.justflight.com/product/pa38-tomahawk-microsoft-flight-simulator?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New Just Flight PA-38 Tomahawk for Microsoft Flight Simulator - on sale now&utm_content=New Just Flight PA-38 Tomahawk for Microsoft Flight Simulator - on sale now+CID_8d5b685bdf467215f2673b0006f5e62b&utm_source=cm&utm_term=PA-38 Tomahawk -B
  12. Yes and Thank You! Mea Culpa and already corrected. Thanks again, -B
  13. A simple explanation is that you neither own or operate a Software Behemoth. They do and they seem to be doing very well right now. Not everything in life is clear. Accept that and move on and I’m saying this with all respect.
×
×
  • Create New...