turbomax

I would delete the rolling cache and recreate a new one, if needed. if there is a problematic tile (missing, defect), the simulator may use it again every flight instead of re-loading a new one.

I did indeed begin with FS1 back in 1979: frame times and LOD, what? 🤣 "who would have thought 40 years ago ..."

I had Flight Simulator II for the APPLE II on cassette tape: and then in 1983 the new and improved revolutionary single disk version:

that I don't know. what I do know: https://flightsimexpo.com/ FlightSimExpo 2025 Rhode Island Convention Center JUNE 27-29, 2025 • PROVIDENCE, RI, USA

maybe JUNE 27-29, 2025 ?

fuzzy logic from fuzzy language: " just leave that MSFS2024 alone, seems the best at the moment.." " just leave that MSFS2024 alone. That seems to be the best at the moment.." 🤣

I am not interested in a single userbenchmark comment. but in 27.000 vs. 2.000 uploaded test results, so I would take only their results seriously.

" Intel's marketers remain asleep (terminally?) at the wheel. Nevertheless, the 13600K and 14600K still deliver almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless, as games are normally limited by the GPU. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). Since this summary was published just two days ago, hundreds of twitter threads, thousands of “pcmasterrace” reddit posts, multiple magazine articles, and several youtube videos have emerged in unanimous support for the $480 USD 9800X3D. All of these supposedly disinterested actors are working the weekend to convince you to pay their favourite billion-dollar brand an extra $280 USD this holiday season. [Nov '24 CPUPro]" https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-13600K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-9800X3D/4134vsm2356328

better than the other way around 🤣

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-13600K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-9800X3D/4134vsm2356328 "the 13600K and 14600K still deliver almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless, as games are normally limited by the GPU." at 4K, going from a 4080 to a 4090 would make a bigger difference

there are quite a few, including: https://www.aircharterservice.com/about-us/news-features/blog/the-fastest-private-jets-in-the-world Bombardier Global 8000 – Mach 0.94 (721 mph) Cessna Citation X and X+ – Mach 0.935 (717 mph) Gulfstream G700 – Mach 0.925 (710 mph) Gulfstream G650 and G650ER – Mach 0.925 (710 mph) Bombardier Global 7500 – Mach 0.925 (710 mph)

Redge said: "Mind if I ask your computer specs? That video was buttery smooth. I'm running a 7800X3D with an RTX4090 (3440x1440) and get nowhere near that consistent chop-free smoothness, even in 2024." don't forget to ask him what resolution was in use. (in addition to many additional sim related settings) the youtube shows a 1440p resolution, not sure if that is what he was using. 2560 x 1440 pixel. over 3,6 mega pixel your 3440x1440 is already 5 mega pixel I am running 3840x2160 = 8.2 mega pixel ......................... and we are not finished, my total VR resolution pixels: 2880x2880 = 8.2 mega pixel PER EYE, and I am glad I have only 2 of those. 🤣

that stinks.

my xbox app for PC: click FILES then BROWSE

exactly, that's why I chose the non-standard, but Deluxe Premium Cessna 404 Titan in my example. the VFS in developer mode lets you open the corresponding .CFG files.