January 6, 200818 yr Hi,What's the better setup? Should I use FS2004 scenery directly or should it be Cached?. Former Beta Tester - (for a few companies) - As well as provide Regional Voice Set Recordings Two: AMD-9950X | One: AMD-7950X3D | Three: Asus TUF 4090s | Three: 64GB DDR5 RAM 6000mhz | Three: Cosair 1300 P/S | Three: 990Pro 2TB NVME One: Eugenius ECS2512 - 2.5 GHz Switch | Three: Ice Giant Elite CPU Coolers | Three: 75" 4K UHDTVs | One: Boeing 737NG Flight Deck
January 6, 200818 yr Never cache the scenery if you have room on your hard drive. The MSFS cache (not to be confused with the O/S cache) is a holdover from the days when we boasted about our 500 megabyte hard drives and MSFS taxed every bit of that hard drive space. MSFS offered (and still offers) the option of reading scenery directly from CD. But reading from CD is slower than reading from a hard drive, especially back when the cache was first implemented. So the cache offered a way of reading the most often used scenery from CD and writing it out to the cache folder on the hard drive. The sim would then read from the cache folder on subsequent reads.So what does caching accomplish if the scenery is already on the hard drive? It moves the scenery from point A on your hard drive, and places it in point B (the cache folder) from which subsequent reads are done. In other words, it adds overhead to the overall running of the sim.Hope this is helpful!Regards,John
January 6, 200818 yr Author Hi John,Thanks for the info and quick reply. Former Beta Tester - (for a few companies) - As well as provide Regional Voice Set Recordings Two: AMD-9950X | One: AMD-7950X3D | Three: Asus TUF 4090s | Three: 64GB DDR5 RAM 6000mhz | Three: Cosair 1300 P/S | Three: 990Pro 2TB NVME One: Eugenius ECS2512 - 2.5 GHz Switch | Three: Ice Giant Elite CPU Coolers | Three: 75" 4K UHDTVs | One: Boeing 737NG Flight Deck
Create an account or sign in to comment