Sign in to follow this  
Guest cbuchner1

Better than tileproxy

Recommended Posts

Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

San Juan de Pasto in Columbia. *heads off to check the rendering in FS*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not the quite the approach I had expected in FSX.terrain complexity = 66%terrain resolution =10mthe runway headings are different in FSX too for some reason (01/19) but the vid clip had 02/200.I thought there'd be at least the deep valleys similar to the vid.not my best approach but it made the landing even better ;)1.JPG2.JPG3.JPG4.JPG5.JPG6.JPG7.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry forgot to say, that is just standard FSX.I wanted to checked the terrain before trying in tile proxy but I think i'll give it a miss as the terrain doesnt seem to be like real world :/dont have time or HD space to d/l addon mesh right now.then agian maybe its my sliders causing lack of terrain but they seem high enough surely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can forget doing it with tileproxy. I checked the area with Flashearth and the resolution is not good enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you'd need a high res mesh for South America for best effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads up on the FS Global 2008 mesh scenery Christian.I just recieved my copy of FS Global 2008 X Scenery (for FSX).THIS is what I was expecting... looks very similar to that in real life mesh-wise.just a shame theres not better tile coverage of the area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The mesh is good but the blurry textures are horrible.... Is that because tileproxy does not recognize this area?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its just a matter of the lack of detailed photo scenery coverage for that area of the world.the photo coverage detail varies though from different providers for the same areas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The area is probably not currently considered "important" enough for a decent coverage in the major map providers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this