Farlis

Which is exacltly the reason why aircraft add on developers so far have refrained from implementing taxi-cameras in their aircraft. Except for Aerosoft, but they cheat by not actually rendering what is in the sim. So I tried this with the INIA380. Yes, there is a performance penalty. But it is manegable if you get something to help you taxi easier. I have yet to find the right exposure setting, because it is a little difficult to see. But overall as a proof of concept I like it. ASOBO really needs to work on some rendering pipeline to make this possible without killing performance. And from the comments it is not compatible with Reshade.

My guess is those stutters come from the sims precaching setting. It is probably not set correctly for the amount of VRAM/RAM available.

Yes, you are wrong. It doesn't need a database, it reads the simbrief plan and whatever your sim has installed.

Basically the last ones missing are the complete NEOS and the A330. I mean actually good A330's, not the Aerosoft trash.

I did not pay much attention to the general area before but I wanted to start a virtual hike on the Pamir Trail and was quite dismayed at the low resolution of the DEM.

Some? I'd say two. And only one is really significant in terms of heights. ;)

It certainly fills one of the last gaps in the coverage of Europe. Now only southern Balkans and Greece is missing. I also wouldn't mind France getting a second round of treatment. It is in my opinion the most interesting place to explore in Europe with its wide range of geographically different regions.

But the distance at which it happens is usually acceptable an only glaringly obvious with a couple of models.

I'm certainly getting fed up with the constant nagging negativity in parts of the community I look so forward to be just spending this afternoon flying the A380.

I know.😉 Maybe read the opening post of this thread again. No one was taking about Seb.

And Jörg is not Seb.

Has already been answered a couple of times.

He is totally correct. I use the AIG packages and almost none of the included aircraft suffer the problem. But a few select ones do very much. It's particularly bad with the 787.

Erm... were did you get the idea that just because his Dad was from Gdansk that this makes Jörg half-polish? Gdansk had a predominantly german population up until 1945. Before 1831 there did not even live a single polish speaking person in the city.

No. I could guess that it Manager might be added to the A350 V2 No. It runs unproblematic on a 4060 TI

As do I. Despite payware add ons eventually outshining them and their projects, which should be a no brainer, their efforts and what they achieved for free in the last 5 years is marvellous and will go down in history as one of the best freeware airliner products ever. And I can imagine that their A380 pushed Inibuilds further in the sense of: "Look at what they achieved in their free time for free. Come on guys lets up the ante!"

Always pay attention to the green dot on the speedtape. You have to go to flaps 1 below it. Also your report on the aircraft pitching up too much after take off seems to indicate you set the take off trim incorrectly.

Less than 24 hours after Release? No.

Tested the Jump Ahead feature. Not quite as good as the Toliss one, but still very usefull. Perfect to quickly jump across the pond in an hour and do an approach. Interesting flight characteristics. The roll is very slow but the pitch is very nimble.

Just bought and fired her up at Simwings Munich. Ini really paid attention to optimization. It performs really well with my lowly 8GIG 4060TI.

Do you remember there was an add on for P3D that had a low res aerial meant to be viewed from airliner altitudes? If that wouldn't have made a difference in how the world looks down below, there would not have been a market for this. I find the awesomeness of MS2024 is that it looks great from all heights as long as you stay out of areas where data sources are very sparse, like the Arctics, China etc. You can walk around and really feel like you are there or you zoom over it at FL430 and still feel like you are flying over the actual earth and not just some landclassed approximation of it.

BATC does the same. If it detects the sim is not at real time it offers to switch traffic to scheduled instead of live.

And I thought you meant recently...

The kind of practice to hide or make hard to find a lower tier subscritption is illegal where I live.

Do you have two sceneries installed?