Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest JamesWoods

Gone back to TrafficX from UT2

Recommended Posts

Guest JamesWoods

Getting same fps with TrafficX as i did with UT2 ,but definatly no more traffic injection pauses, and the enroute traffic also seems more realistic, cuase with UT2 it seems enroute traffic sort of dissapears till you near desitnation airport.TrafficX models are not as good as UT2 , but i could definatly do without the annoying traffic injection pause.with cs767 am getting around 11fps on final, about 29 fps in cruise, 15 on approach.Its back to Trafficx for me now. And the models are largly alright. System i7920@3.8 gtx285 vista64edit::if you dont have high end system, cs767 will be too fps on your system

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi James,Please don't open multiple threads about the same topic.http://forums1.avsim.net/index.php?showtopic=258879&hl=I lock this one.Thx


Best regards,
David Roch

AMD Ryzen 5950X //  Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII EXTREME //  32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR4 4000 MHz CL17 //  ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 24GB OC Edition //  2x SSD 1Tb Corsair MP600 PCI-E4 NVM //  Corsair 1600W PSU & Samsung Odyssey Arc 55" curved monitor
Thrustmaster Controllers: TCA Yoke Pack Boeing Edition + TCA Captain Pack Airbus Edition + Pendular Rudder.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...