September 16, 200916 yr Presently for my weather I use FSMeteo for FS9 and the FSX default weather for FSX. In the past I also used Cris Clouds in FS9 but since my curent upgrade to an i7 975 CPU and 64 bit system did not reinstall them. I have debated upgrading to Active Sky for years but have really never been too picky or critical relative to clouds so I have procrastinated (Something I am very good at). However, particularly with my new system one item does bug me. My home area is in West Virginia and particularly during this time of year there are a multitude of low level clouds hanging in between the mountains. The thing I don't like is that under these conditions, the clouds below make it look like the dead of winter and everything is covered with snow.Would Active Sky Advanced significantly improve this image? A second question would be is there any problem with Active Sky on a Windows XP Pro 64 bit system?Thanks:RTH
September 16, 200916 yr Would Active Sky Advanced significantly improve this image? A second question would be is there any problem with Active Sky on a Windows XP Pro 64 bit system?Thanks:RTHFirst answer YES! Difference between Active Sky and default weather engine is like, Cesna and A380.Second answer NO. My Specification: I CAN RUN FSX IN MAX SETTINGS....i don't care about dell, bell, amd, intel, 60000 wats power supply or alien made graphic card....
September 16, 200916 yr Author Thanks for the reply:Just purchased and downloaded ASA.Next: To get it working under WideFS6 for FS9 and the other provisions by Windows or FSX that I am not yet familiar with. If anybody has any advice realative to making that easier, it would be appreciated.Happy flying:RTH
Create an account or sign in to comment