April 23, 201115 yr Until my beloved QX9650 bit the dust last week, I ran my machine w/ the posted timings, and which pretty much limited me to 408x4 or 1632Mhz w/ the DRAM I am using. Since picking up a replacement Q9650 (didn't want to change anything else out since the mainboard and memory and PSS are fine and so on--I plan on a big upgrade in about 2y) I have dabbled in DRAM Freq of 1680 w/ more relaxed timings. Seems fine, have no idea what the max I can do and still be w/in DRAM voltage etc. Still getting decent latency scores (~47ns) and better read scores so is there a good reason to go more for tighter timings or better to shoot for higher memory read scores w/ more relaxed timings etc? Haven't flown any yet w/ to test this. I had great performance previously.Noel Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
Create an account or sign in to comment