Random failure settings and a suggestion

[suavi 0]

Hello,I have started to use random failures as a new challenge and noticed that random failure setting resets itself at every session start. I set it to "yes" and frequency to 2, i get a minor or major failure during the flight beginning right after the setting change, however, i found it reverted to "no" at the next FSX startup.I am aware that this setting is livery specific, i checked several times and sure about this is how it works at the moment at SP1b. I reviewed the introduction manual and couldn't find any information why it is programmed it this way. So, I will be delighted if somebody give an explanation.And I have a future development request about failure settings: Moving service based failures parameter from livery specific category to sim options category or at least let the user decide to select the category according to his/her preference. Because I think some of us use different liveries and choose one among them regarding the route selection for the session. This makes hard to reach 250 hours service time even for a frequent simmer like me (approximately 25 hours a month). Although the current application is more compliant with the reality as failures specific to aircraft in reality, my suggestion will improve the challenge and enjoyment of simulation.Best regards,Suavi Akar

[guenseli 1,606]

You can save the failure setting also with the panel state.I will do it the same way - it works!With this, you can now load different panel states for different liveries (at startup) ...I agree with you that a "accerated service based failure module" would be nice.This wish was mentioned many times here in the forum, but i never had read an answer ...

[suavi 0]

You can save the failure setting also with the panel state.I will do it the same way - it works!With this, you can now load different panel states for different liveries (at startup) ...I agree with you that a "accerated service based failure module" would be nice.This wish was mentioned many times here in the forum, but i never had read an answer ...

Guenther,Thank you. I didn't imagine that it will work in that way. So, it is not an issue any more for me. I noticed your posts about the failure model while searching for the random failure thing. Let's hope that someone has noted it for future releases. Best regards,Suavi