guenseli

First hand from a Phenom pilot which was asked exact this question on Rauls Discord Phenom beta. And its also interesting to see how often manufacturer manuals differ from the actual real aircraft. Thats the advantage to have several Phenom pilots during beta testing. they can verify such irritations, because evrybody says "but in the FCOM, Manual, etc...." and the pilot says "No, it isn't in reality".

Wrong. Only over TOGA

Sorry David! I also had reports of users from Japan reporting earthquakes

Yes, I avoid it now. 5000 downloads and nearly all computers exploded.

No need to feel sorry. Thanks that you tried to advertise it. But as I say in the description I'm not able to make any bug fixes. And before anyones system will explode using my tool, I take it better offline.

I removed that tool from flightsim.to I have no desire for panic to break out here simply because I programmed this tool using AI. The description clearly states that everyone uses it at their own risk—and I myself have been using it for months without any issues. I am merely sharing my work in the hope that others will find it useful. However, I have no need for negative reviews or warnings directed at my work.

Better to keep comments and interactions at one place and handle them well, or have several places and probably loose oversight?

@marcom is AviaSoft still in service or abandoned? software in it current state works, but are you still developing? Any future plans? EDIT: just seen your other response. ok, still alive. hope further addons will be supported then in future. But any response to my question above?

Yes, they make a series "the 100 Phenom features", and one feature per day

+1000

Not quite correct from my point of experience. I fly mainly Europe, mainly IFR with SIDs and STARs, and I get this issue 100%. If I request descent, answer is "land runway xy" (only if ATC haven't me told to descend before, but told me the expected approach) I filed this bug many, many times, at least since September, maybe already earlier. Others have done too. But no reaction and no fix.

Standard is enough. none of the additional Asobo/Microsoft aircraft or sceneries are worth it. Better invest into proper addons then.

I highly vote for that we get a flightsim wide binding agreement what "soon" should mean!!! Can't be that it stretches from a few days to a year, depending on the developer (I do not mean that serious!)

Hmpf, they do not aim at international customers with that trailer it seems 😉 EDIT: I mean the second video on the SimMarket page which I accidently hit, it seems. This is from a polish beta tester. Looking forward to some english streams heopfully

Now that Aerosoft released an update with an API could this considered? Maybe a little answer about this, please? AeroSoft does not even seem to know what a remote MCDU is 🙃