• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

115 Excellent

1 Follower

About guenseli

  • Rank
    Member - 2,000+

Flight Sim Profile

  • Online Flight Organization Membership
  • Virtual Airlines

Contact Methods

  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

7,498 profile views
  1. Loading the bus after a default aircraft still works
  2. I tried the new FSUIPC and the latest LINDA beta you rpovided. No success. There is no error in the log now, but I can see with my MCP combo that FSX default is loaded. Note, that do not have installed the bus in the default place from the FSLabs installer. Here is what my add-on.xml reads: <SimBase.Document Type="AddOnXml" version="4,0" id="add-on"> <AddOn.Name>Flight Sim Labs Products</AddOn.Name> <AddOn.Description>FSLabs Product Family. Publisher: Flight Sim Labs, Ltd.</AddOn.Description> <!-->Libraries Components</--> <AddOn.Component> <Name>FSLabs Sounds Module</Name> <Category>DLL</Category> <Path>Libraries\FSLSounds.dll</Path> </AddOn.Component> <AddOn.Component> <Name>FSLabs Events Module</Name> <Category>DLL</Category> <Path>Libraries\FSLEvents.dll</Path> </AddOn.Component> <AddOn.Component> <Name>FSLabs Options Module</Name> <Category>DLL</Category> <Path>Libraries\FSLOptions.dll</Path> <DLLType>PDK</DLLType> <DLLStartName>PDKDLLStart</DLLStartName> </AddOn.Component> <AddOn.Component> <Category>SimObjects</Category> <Path>SimObjects/Airplanes</Path> </AddOn.Component> <AddOn.Component> <Category>Effects</Category> <Path>Effects</Path> </AddOn.Component> <AddOn.Component> <Category>EXE</Category> <Path>Libraries\FSL_Configurator.exe</Path> <CommandLine>..\SimObjects\Airplanes</CommandLine> </AddOn.Component> </SimBase.Document> located in F:\0_P3D_Externe Szenerien\FsLabs A320\FSLabs
  3. Yes, it is right. Loading another (standard) plane before is working. Having indeed loaded the A320 directly till now.
  4. Great! thanks!
  5. Fellow bus drivers, do you all get the same error as I get? (open the LINDA console F1) [E] *** LUA Error: F:\Prepar3D v4\modules\linda/system/common.lua:179: attempt to call global 'InitDsp' (a nil value) ???
  6. From my side there are currently no plans to get the 787. May change probably ...
  7. thanks, great support!
  8. Just delete them (copy them to another location for backup) I do this since years
  9. Mike, just wanted to reply and thank for your detailled answer. The initial discussion here was just about that I find it absurd to pay for support - even a few dollar - when I pay 160$ for a complete product. I wouldn't also say nothing if you have say about two years of free support and then there's a little fee for new simulators or whatever. I also do not say that Black Marble is a bad product - the opposite it is I think. Looks very promising. So, hope you enjoy his products and your flight sim. Have a nice day
  10. Glad I'm allowed to move on or not as I like .... Come on, in the beginning there where several cases (I know some personally) which had a mess up with Vector products. Or why is there a reason for you to make a patch for it? Maybe you misinterpret when I say "destroyed" what means of course not a real destroy. But files got messed up with ORBX Vector. And it is also no problem, it is not the point. The point was, that Mike stated, a developer has only to care about a vanilla installation, where I have a different opinion (and many of your customers obvisiously) I find it very rude to call my opinion an "ill opinion". Black Marble really looks interesting, but paying for support and now getting rude answers makes me feel happy to support other developers with my money.
  11. Mike, I'd like to reply again, now as the topic has separated and some of your arguments are still... no arguments. Of course it is not unusual to test a new product with a vanilla installation. But it is also not unusual to test that addon with that configuration the most customers will have. And ORBX is with Global and Vector still market leader. And if not ORBX, the people use UTX as not many rely on a vanilla installation today. A vanilla sim is the basic where it has to run. But developing a product ignoring the leading Vector Addons is still ... a bit stupid, sorry. And it has been a while till Chris answered the question and admited that he hasn't tested it with vector. Meanwhile the first customers have destroyed their installations. So, this is not customer support in my opinion. And it is also not unusual that companies give refund. Flight1 and Lockheed Martin give you a refund without any question. But you can get it also from A2A and some others if you have good arguments - not as unusual as you say. And giving a refund after his products have destroyed the customers installation due to the incompatibility of its untested products is not generous, it's his duty to avoid a shitstorm. I do not take much care about his products (even, the screenshots look nice) and I do not much take care if one buys it or not.Everybody as he likes. But Mike, I'm sorry, many of your arguments are simply plain wrong and I just wanted to give another opinion. (btw.: why can't Chris post on this forums but give you reputation points for every post you make??)
  12. Hello Daniel, No, every addon needs a complete unique module, especially from different developers. Every developer handles the internal code in a different way, even the same developer is changing it's codes from addon to addon. So, you can't even use a single line of PMDG JS41 code for the 228. I do not own or plan to buy the Do228, I'm sorry.
  13. I do not and Chris does also not ... remember the initial costs of Black Marble? Please ask if PMDG, FSLabs, A2A, Aerosoft, JustFlight ... oh and all others ... do work for free! As I said. I will not support it. And will now close this case on my side.