guenseli

Slowly, slowly, prices rise again to P3D level. Why do we customers support this? (think about a 60$ Fenix back then)

Repeating it again and again doesn't make it more true. You even posted yourself the product description and there is clearly stated what you get for one time 30$. If you want additional premium voices you have to pay extra, yes. No, its not apples to apples! SI offers ATC with focus on LLM voices BATC offers ATC with focus controlling AI traffic BATC basic voices are actually really good, do not not bash that tool by implicating that it is useless using just basic voices. That is not true. But again, you know all this. Simply don't understand what your mission is here ...

What do you talk about?? The full product of BATC costs one(!) time 30$ You talk about premium voices which are optional and no way needed to enjoy BATC. But you surely know that! That ... 🤢🤮 ... my ATC toy is better then yours discussion is really hilarious. And no mods around which will merge all these pointless threads together

Come on, we all know your mission now ... 🙄

FSHud?

Ok, tbh, maybe I miss some sub message cause I'm not native speaker. But can't see anything wrong. It's funny in some way, but not bizzare

Why is every thread about BATC lately a comparison between BATC and SI??? Why not BATC vs. FSHud? SI costs 200$ per year, it should of course be far ahead regarding LLM voices and phrases. Why instead should they take that much money for it? SayIntensions does not have or control its own traffic Sayintension is voice using only It is a complete different approch for ATC as BATC. Why does it always get compared with BATC?? That does absolutely make no sense to me? That is the reason, why I express my doubts what is going on here. It is not only about bashing BATC, its about that the comparison is always with SI and not with FSHud.

I do not bash the OP. It is more then fishy that in the last days every second thread is about how bad BATC is. But: I just express myself 😉 (and I do not defend BATC, I just wonder what happens here)

I have to search now if there is any reward program making money by bashing BATC... Where is it? Where's the money 🤥

every flight simulation fan should get into Star Citizen. you will get very relaxed about development times or server issues 😄

I expect ice cream for free every day 😋 I'm out here. OP has a mission, maybe cause he got banned, who knows. But the arguments are not rational here.

So, you won't use their support channel, but complain to not get support ? What hinders you to join their discord? "**More on vectors from the above patch notes**: Our old vector engine was hit and miss when it came to vector instructions. 70% of the time, when it worked, it worked very well, and 30% of the time when it failed it failed badly. .... With this patch, the vector engine is completely new, rewritten from the ground up to dynamically adjust its handling to the situation. This allows for aggressive vectors to get you back in position to avoid terrain, or soft corrections if the system detects you're starting to drift slightly off course. Since this system is new, it may fail in the situations we didn't test it. That means in some instances the new system may *appear* worse than the old one - but rest assured this new system is far more capable and easy to tune. We need your help to put it through its paces and let us know what's working and what isn't so we may tune it to get every situation correct. We will keep this in experimental a bit to tune it, then move it over to EA when it's stable. I'll make a video explaining more about how we solved these issues soon as it's quite an interesting topic.

It was released last year, wasnt it? As early access. Made me think you mix up things with FSHud which is indeed several years on the market now. Is it better? Can't agree on bad customer Support. Also in opposite to FSHud in earlier times. (but FSHud developer learned sth meanwhile regarding how to treat customers) So, for sure, batc is far from perfect. Especially the last EX versions are a step back, and they explained why. But give them also some time. Or do we have better options?

Its not just a feeling, its a matter of course, that a modern flight simulation has sth like this. For me personally, all that fancy camera stuff does not make any sense as long as we do not have the possibilities like in FSX/P3D (20 years ago!!) to open separate windows with separate views! Shame, that this aspect does not get any attention. But back to Chaseplane ... looks nice