guenseli

Just read about this: Flightsim.toWildfire Panel App - MSFS Add-on - Flightsim.to✓ For Microsoft Flight Simulator: This add-on introduces a wildfire tracking and suppression app for Microsoft Flight Simulator. It uses real-world wildfire data from NASA FIRMS to spawn fires that usNot tested, just discovered

If the fast output of features has sth to do with Ai? 🤔😋 Anyway, it's great to see what Umberto releases for free! Many thanks!!

No, it's Toliss fault alone. Long before the release it was already clear, that Aerosoft is not a company I would partner with.

I would not call it scam. Especially not the Toliss A340. But Aerosoft is one of these dinosaur relicts of FSX/P3D days who have a hard time to keep up with the modern sim and community. Not to say that there own developed products do not have a good quality since many years, beside a few exceptions. But maybe there other sim branches running very good, so that they can neglect the flightsim development, I don't know. And the 400.000€ of german tax money will still help them also for a while 🤑

It is out now: EmergencyDispatcherPro | Aerosoft Shop And there's a demo: EmergencyDispatcherPro - 24h Free Trial | Aerosoft Shop

Indeed! Until I noticed it is from Aerosoft ... 👎 Means many bugs, no support, just one or two fixes and then vanishing EDIT: the half trailer is about hoisting operations and then there's a small disclaimer that hoisting only works with payware HPG145 (which has already a mission system from HPG). Hope, I will be surprised

Would be nice you avoid all that "community" and "we", because you surely do not talk for everyone, for sure not for me. Its just your opinion.

Welcome the new developer NScenery to the marketplace

ok, I will do

I never do this. However, if any problems arise, where the cause is not clear, then keep it in mind.

Where2Fly there you can make own lists with your airports and let the app choose from NextSimFlight - There's always another runway to discover This is kind of similar but different 😉 but I don't know if you can add own installed sceneries. What I prefer for every flight is Volanta It does not suggest routing, but it automatically crawls and shows your installed scenery. In the app above you have to manually keep track and organize what you have installed. In combination with the oversight where your aircrafts are "parked", you could then choose flights And have a nice flight tracking overview and many things more! VATSIM controller/zones, simbrief OFP, etc. I just use the free version

So, I can insert one picture, but not a second one ... both use the same kind of link .... 🤔 Sth does not work

test https://i.postimg.cc/5tpFVjPy/Screenshot-2026-06-13-140047.png

Yes, retail as anybody else

Yes, read your own quote I inserted above! To say the M600 has a much lower quality in general is simply not true. And that is why I try to show my side of the experience. I have now said several times: I understood and see that you have a problem. But it is not how the M600 is created in general. I hope for you that you get it solved somehow ... My system is a 4080 Super at 4k

Have you checked my video? https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/697250-msfs-expert-series-2-the-piper-m600-by-fsreborn/page/2/#findComment-5776709

Also no problem with LODs here: https://youtu.be/voTcPZtbA2M

I refer to guys which stating because of your screenshots that this product have been released with this bad textures in 2026 and that they would have expected better internal textures in general. That is plain wrong because this addon was obvisously created with better textures. I can see that there's sth wrong on your side, if its your systems fault or some bug from the addon I can't say. But of course this addon is not created in general with such bad textures as you and others say here. If you couldn't properly understand what I mean I' sorry, it's maybe because I'm no native speaker. But try to understand what I want to say and don't call me a word not allowed. That's rude and not true. I just want to avoid that wrong statements start to spread ... (however that's nearly impossible to avoid at AVSIM, I know)

Come on, what a drama again. have a look at my screenhots ... there's some individual settings or streaming or whatever problem. On my side everthing is ok What I mean with it is, that not the addon in general is that bad. There's some hickup, yes, but it's not that FSR has released something like that.

ImgBBScreenshot 2026 06 13 140036 hosted at ImgBBBild Screenshot 2026 06 13 140036 gehostet auf ImgBBhttps://ibb.co/FLcRTpqT https://ibb.co/chBQDmhS Sorry, I don't know it better currently how to post screenshots properly here at AVSIM But above shows clearly there's no issue with resolution in general. Must be some individual hickup

Nothing I would say. It depends how you start your marketing. If you decide to start with superlatives without delivering anything, then I would say its very normal people are sceptical. Why not start marketing when there is something really, really good to show where everyone could see in one trailer that this is the best software ever now. Yes, and not only once. How many companies have been there, annoucing the best of the best and delivered standard or less?

Ah ok, thx. So - in short - subscription. However flexible etc. Depends on the price, but in general I'm then out already. Doubt the price will be really low (e.g. 5€ month/max). But we will see ...

Was it mentioned somewhere already if this is a single purchase or an abo pricing?

First hand from a Phenom pilot which was asked exact this question on Rauls Discord Phenom beta. And its also interesting to see how often manufacturer manuals differ from the actual real aircraft. Thats the advantage to have several Phenom pilots during beta testing. they can verify such irritations, because evrybody says "but in the FCOM, Manual, etc...." and the pilot says "No, it isn't in reality".

Wrong. Only over TOGA