Hi,

Is there a way to show the airspace altitudes on the elevation profile so you can see the atc control zones altitude on your flight plan as you would fly through or how to avoid?

Thanks

Hi Ollie,

sorry, currently not. Will come in a future version (probably 2.6) since it was already requested often.

Alex

Fully aware this is a very old topic, but I was wondering if this is now possible (I'm on v2.6.19)?

Thank you so much for making Little Navmap, which is just awesome!

Not for the next major 2.8, sorry. I'll prioritize this more since it is requested quite often. This task can be very CPU intensive. Therefore, it has to be done in background.

Alex

Understood - well, once again I'm in AWE of what Little Navmap delivers for free, so regardless of this feature being here or not, I'm still a very happy user.

 

On 9/9/2022 at 10:59 AM, albar965 said:

Not for the next major 2.8, sorry. I'll prioritize this more since it is requested quite often. This task can be very CPU intensive. Therefore, it has to be done in background.

Alex

Hi Alexander,

Besides sponsoring you on Github, which I already do, have you considered feature bounties? Given SkyDemon is a £129/year subscription I would wager quite a few would move their sim VFR flying onto Little Nav Map if it supported airspaces in elevation view. I'd be happy to commit a sizable start to a feature bounty pool if this was something you'd be able to prioritise. The alternative is to subscribe to SkyDemon, which seems rather overkill for a little bit of VFR simming.

Cheers,

Bjorn

On 8/19/2024 at 10:55 AM, sunbeam60 said:

Besides sponsoring you on Github, which I already do, have you considered feature bounties? Given SkyDemon is a £129/year subscription I would wager quite a few would move their sim VFR flying onto Little Nav Map if it supported airspaces in elevation view. I'd be happy to commit a sizable start to a feature bounty pool if this was something you'd be able to prioritise. The alternative is to subscribe to SkyDemon, which seems rather overkill for a little bit of VFR simming.

Hi Bjorn,

thank you for the offer but I'm not sure if I'd like to go this way. At the end a feature might not doable, too much work or take too. What then?

I put the airspace on the list for 3.2. I yet have to see how this can be implemented. Looks like I have to add more accurate airspace boundaries before.

Alex