Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest B1900 Mech

College vs. Flight School

Recommended Posts

Guest WhiteIce89

Let me introduce myself first. I'm a high school junior and I live in NYC. I've had my eye on becoming an airline pilot for quite some time now, and I am determined to do this. I absolutely can't get flying off my mind. While all my friends can't wait to get their driver's licenses, I can't wait to become a pilot. Problem is, I'm stuck between two choices:a) A college that offers the Professional Pilot degree, of which there are not too many. :( Flight school.The basic difference is that in the college degree, you have a couple of extra courses in addition to flight training. This also means you have to pay for college tuition PLUS flight school training. I've asked some colleges to send me a course list in the degree and this is what I got back (I excluded the actual flight and ground training):AVN 100 General AeronauticsAVN 101 Aviation HistoryAVN 102 Aviation MeteorologyAVN 300 Government In AviationAVN 320 Air Carrier Flight OpsAVN 322 Advanced Aircraft SystemsAVN 321 Physiology of FlightAVN 400 Aviation LawAVN 417 Homeland SecurityAVN 425 Safety of FlightNow, there were some other ones, but these are some of the more interesting courses offered. My question to you real-life pilots: In your opinion, are these courses practical, and also, which of the two, college or straight to flight school, would be a better choice? I can't imagine doing anything else in the world other than becoming a professional pilot. :D

Share this post


Link to post

Hi.In order to have a better chance to get an Airline job, you need a degree. That should help you decide.As far as the courses you will get most of the same information, to a lesser detail, if you get to the CFI/ATP level. TV

Share this post


Link to post
Guest DreamFleet

Actually you are stuck between 3 not 2 choices, the third being a college that offers courses that have little or nothing to do with aviation, and do NOT deny that as a valid option.Most pilots I know, and this does not mean that this is always the better way to go, but it IS worth listening to, did NOT go to aviation schools / universities, and instead went to college to study something else, such as business, engineering, etc.Have something to fall back on in your career, and while I am certain some will give me flack over saying that, it is very valid and wise advice, and I am not the first one to give such.Example: Eric Ernst of 767 PIC / LDS 767 fame did not go to an aviation university / school. He learned to fly as I did, from a local flight school, and also went to college for a degree (not aviation related).I did the same thing, and only due to the death of my father did I decide to take my business degree and take over the family business, as opposed to going for the airlines. Today, I am most happy I did. I still fly, on my terms, and do not have some TSA person questioning my four stripes, and patting me down when I try to get to the plane. I also don't have to worry about my pension fund turning into smoke because of someone with an MBA who is more concerned about shareholder equity, stock price and their stock options / golden parachute.Example: You have a choice of a course named: "AVN 300 Government In Aviation"??Forget that, you can learn that just reading the web, and no airline is going to test / interview you on that. Afterall, even the current FAA administrator is not a pilot. You don't need it.Oh, "AVN 101 Aviation History"?? C'mon, like that's going to help you?No way. You can learn that with Google in your spare time these days, believe it or not.Better off to take a course like, oh, any course non-aviation related. Like accounting, marketing, law, almost anything else!Nothing wrong with pursuing a 100% aviation-oriented degree, but there is also nothing wrong with having something to fall back on, just in case. You may not think of that now, but when those bills come in every month it will really hit home!Go to college and study something else, then go to Comair or similar, and "fast track" it. Or do like I did and Eric Ernst did, and many other pilots did, aside from those who did it the military way, and I had that opportunity to, as I was once in AFROTC. Yes, it will not be cheap to do, but nothing about real aviation is cheap.The last thing you want is to find yourself out of a job, and not know how to read a "balance sheet" or know what "market elasticity" is, or know something else that may pertain to a good paying job that you might need once you have a family and some major bills to pay.Trust me, most employers will not care about you quoting the FAA regs or being able to read an approach chart.You do not need an "aviation degree", in fact you are better off having a degree in something else. Really, the airlines do not care when it comes to your degree, just your flying abilities / experience, and your ability to pass their interview.No offense, but after a while, flying is just a job, it may seem the greatest thing in the world right now, for which nothing can even come close, but as you get older, start a family, and start paying a mortgage, you will see it is for what it is; just a job. If you lose it, and cannot find another, all that aviation education might not get you as far as you think.Aways remember, most of the folks running airlines come from basically a business background, not an aviation one- they are not pilots. The days of Howard Hughes running (in his case owning) TWA, and Eddie Rickenbacker running Eastern are looong gone.You're going into a world run by folks with MBAs; business majors, accountants and such. Don't lock yourself into just knowing about aviation. :-)Regards,http://www.dreamfleet2000.com/gfx/images/F...R_FORUM_LOU.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

I agree with Lou. When I begun my flight training last year I was determined to do a "Professional Pilot degree". But after talking to several (current/retired) airline pilots, I was convinced on taking a degree not aviation related. Their advice was pretty much what Lou says above. Airlines don't care if you know about the history of aviation, all they care about is your ability to fly, your experience and your attitude.The advantage of having a non-aviation degree is that if you don't get into an airline, or for some reason you lose your airline spot you still have something to fall back on.Next year I begin a double degree in computer science and aviation. The aviation side of it is strictly PPL/CPL/ATPL subjects only, nothing on history or anything non-essential like that. Even so, I am trying like crazy to finish my CPL subjects and exams before the end of the year (I take my PPL exam this weekend or Tuesday the latest... fingers crossed :D ) so that I can concentrate on my ATPL at Uni.I think I

Share this post


Link to post
Guest WhiteIce89

Thanks a lot for the responses, guys!Well, before the whole pilot thing hit me, I was going to do graphic or web design. Perhaps it would be better to fall back, work on my degree in design and in the meantime, work on some flight training as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest

there is no requirement to get a degree unless you want to work for fedex, and even then, people without degrees have been hired. Not everyone needs to go in debt to pay somebody to teach them how to learn

Share this post


Link to post
Guest CRJ700FO

there are tons of options out there.uncle sam will teach you to fly for free if you sign up for 10 years (and its no guarantee you will make it).my best piece of advice is to get a PRACTICAL 4 year degree in something you enjoy and can make money in (business, finance, computers, etc). you can take flying lessons while you are at school and just set up a program not unlike ERAU (ie private freshman year, instrument in sophomore, commercial and flight instructor in junior, teach during senior year).the 4 year pilot schools are RIPOFFS imho. the "professional" pilot programs at flight safety, comair (delta connection or whatever they're calling it now), pan am, westwind, atp, etc are all RIPOFFS. overpriced cessna/piper and seminole time pure and simple. your flight certificate says FAA on it, not where you went.if you're going to spend $70,000 on an "education" do not spend it at these "schools". spend it at a state college and fly with the difference, you will SAVE money (albeit be in school longer). ENJOY college, it is the BEST time of your life.starting pay at the regional airlines is under $20,000 dollars. it will still be that when you graduate. you have that to look forward to!first things first. go to an AME (aviation medical examiner) here: http://www.faa.gov/pilots/amelocator/spend the $70 bucks or so to get your student pilot certificate, which is also your medical certificate. SEE if you can qualify for a 1st class medical (its no big deal). if so, that piece of paper will be good for what you need for 36 months. then start your senior year in high school perhaps getting your private pilots license. you may not like it, or you may love it. use the locality of a good part 61 school as a selection for a college.good luck.my history for what it is worth:bachelor of science in actuarial science7 years of actuarial science work1 year of CFI experience6 months of 135 "check flying"former 121 CA and now current 121 FO for a large regional airlinethe regionals have not always hired 500hr "wonders". post 9/11 the job market was tight up until 2004.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest John_Hirsch

One very important fact to consider -If you attempt and earn a college degree, it is always yours and it can never be taken away from you. It also has that advantage of showing others that you are serious about the profession you choose.Best to you and your future plans.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest WhiteIce89

Can't thank you guys enough, now I have even more to think about :]. One thing is that I live in the city (NYC) and proximity to an airport isn't too great. However, my number one college of choice right now is in Buffalo and it's about 10 minutes from Buffalo Niagara Int'l. The airport seems to have a pretty nice flight school. Plus I always had a general dislike for huge cities, so I'm gonna enjoy some time out of NYC.Also, I think maybe I should take an introductory flight, as I've never actually flied in general aviation aircraft before, just in airliners. Just to make sure I really want this.This is a great community BTW, you guys rock :D

Share this post


Link to post
Guest DreamFleet

Here's a good start...If you are not a member, join AOPA, and if nothing else, visit their forums (for members only). It will give you an insight to the real world, one that FS forums never will.That aside, YES, you should take an introductory flight, and see if this is something you want to do.In FS, many think that flying is just about programming an FMC and using an autopilot to do it for you, but what they do not realize is that you do not get to that point in real life until you have flown those little GA aircraft, without all that automation to do it for you, and I hope that never changes!Take that intro flight, then go from there.Thanks for the kind remarks, but no need to thank us.Advice is easy to give, and is worth what you pay for it.However, in this case, it is worth following at any price, so take that intro flight, then go from there with the knowledge that we will always be there to support you along the way, provided that is the way you want to go.Best wishes. :-)Regards,http://www.dreamfleet2000.com/gfx/images/F...R_FORUM_LOU.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Guest

I've heard the job of an airliner pilot doing longhauls described (by them) as 10 hours of boredom fringed with 5 minutes of sheer terror at either end.Says enough I think about FMCs.And unlike in FS you can't hop over to the pub for a beer or go to the movies after you program that FMC, you're stuck in that seat looking at those numbers changing for the duration with only the guy in the next seat to talk to whom you didn't choose and may not like.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest Traffic

I think there's definitely great advice here for you.I've taken one of those three year degree courses (mostly aviation related studies) while earning the ME/IFR Commercial ticket. While I don't regret it, I think I would have been better off with a degree other than a B.Science one.I ended up getting into an ATCO career and loving it (around Sep 11, not many job vacancies for pilots and starting salaries and working conditions were insulting).I do fly, but mostly for fun and volunteer with the local civil search and rescue as a back up pilot.I think if you're really serious about it, and willing to put up with a lot of crap, I do think a degree is a requirement at this stage. There are way too many pilots out there fighting it out and any bonus you might bring to the interview will be the difference between getting in or not.Something else to consider for after training, and some might not agree with me on this, don't waste too much time flying single-pilot piston ops (such as Instructing) because those hours count for almost nothing come interview time with a major. Aim to get on multi-crew turbine early (Beech 1900s and the like) and I think you'll be much happier in the end.Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest CRJ700FO

>Something else to consider for after training, and some might>not agree with me on this, don't waste too much time flying>single-pilot piston ops (such as Instructing) because those>hours count for almost nothing come interview time with a >major. Aim to get on multi-crew turbine early (Beech 1900s and>the like) and I think you'll be much happier in the end.count me as one who disagrees. flying a 1900 in the right seat is no more valuable than instructing and Gulfstream, et al charge you a lot of money for that "privilege" which is BS! there are a ton of people in the industry who look down on those that do this and it may affect your future career.instructing teaches you HOW to flow and teaches you a great deal about CRM and interaction. a lot of these newer pilots coming through the pipeline think a 15kt crosswind is huge and can barely talk, fly, and chew gum at the same time simply because they were not exposed to all of this in instructing. i learned more about flying in my one year of instructing than in any other phase of my flying career.one thing he ISN't telling you is most places have ICAO minimums for upgrades if you fly internationally (Mexico, Canada, etc). there is a total flight time requirement for this (1200 hours - 61.159(d)). your SIC time only counts for HALF (ie a 2 to 1 ratio is applied to it in counting towards this) and thus will take you twice as long (you can only fly 1000 hours in a year) versus havign all that time before you fly for the airlines through simple instruction and flying checks.the BEST exerience BAR NONE imho is single pilot 135 check flying. you fly in all weather down to mins and are routinely line checked, proficiency checked, and deal with the FAA on some issues. it is wonderful "training" before flying for the airlines.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest Traffic

You make some good points. I agree with some.I instructed for two years and found the experience valuable. What I probably should have said is, "not spend TOO much time instructing" as some people do have more than 90% of their time instructing on singles.All this depends on who you talk to and at which airline. What I said comes from check pilots I spoke with from QANTAS a few years back, and more recently from similar personnel with Air Canada and WestJet, who were heavily involved in interviewing and selection.Does having multi-crew turbine time make you a good pilot? NO. Does having only single time make you a poor one? Absolutely NOT. But as you probably know, almost all airlines' pilot selection departments have unpublished requirements. And many times a good pilot's application, without M/crew time on turbines, just slips through the cracks and disappears without seeing the light of day.I think in this case, it really all depends on who you talk to and the type of person you get at the time of interview and screening. I'm sure many pilots would probably agree with you . But from my experience, and I cannot emphasize this enough (from my own past experience), I still stand by what I said.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest CRJ700FO

Air Canada and Westjet are "major" carriers in Canada. A new hire in the US will not go straight to American or United. Most regional "mins" are around 600-1000 hours of total time with 100 hours of multiengine time. They are so desperate for people the interview pretty much now goes:"Do you breathe and walk ok?""yes""You're hired!"I agree with you though that most carriers with larger airplanes (737's and up) are looking for turbine and crew environment experience. Most have an informal 121 PIC requirement of 1000 hours (SWA just upped theirs to 1300 hrs). But as mentioned earlier, going straight to these carriers in the US is extremely rare.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...