Avcomware

Hi everyone. I am glad you guys enjoy the sim, for me it is still far from being a useful tool, that goes for both well known sims. Every time I want to do an actual practice I go to XP11. There are still too many things that I cannot get done properly, flight dynamics, Wx settings... I am still struggling to get a simple layer of dense fog and fly into the sunset without seeing the horizon, my system can handle the load. I can get around 80 FPS in the configuration / settings I use, but now they introduced the spider web jitters / delays that I cannot eliminate even if I limit the fps to 30. In my opinion there is still a way to go before it gets to the level XP11 as a useful tool. I am glad some of you are having fun with it / enjoy it.

Hi Bjoern. Thank you for you research, I do not get around much other than Avsim, Pilot sof America and a couple of other sites. >>You won't see that effect when you disable 3D vegetation.<< For me it does it on 2D trees, I never use 3D, and I use low Objects, Clouds... On RWY 24 KFUL 1:21 Z Feb 6 I see the orange trees on the left side at the end of the RWY, with default settings. As I start to climb I see them getting more visible. My system can handle it but I find the surface more credible / recognizable with fewer trees, objects..., but I do think that Ortho is mandatory, not necessarily to find your house, but to recognize the areas that I am familiar with, I think LR could benefit from creating Land marks, I did that for myself and the group, but it looks like that is not a priority. 1244 is getting better terrain wise, but still lacking the definition needed to recognize terrain features which is very useful to real World pilots for ground referencing. I was not able to turn the Sun off, I can mask it but there is still that orange halo around, the only way I can get low vis. during before sunset is to modify the windshield to white / dark, oddly enough you can still see the RWY light.. The idea was to create conditions for the pilots to contend with as I've encountered in real life, but a dark windshield would not work because it has to be loaded with the acft. I also tried Autohaze, which uses the same DataRefs I found to help, but but I am unable to create conditions that allow dynamic changes. Thank again, and have a great week.

Hi Bjoern and everyone. Yes, I have pointed that out to LR a long time ago and got no response. It is easy to duplicate the problem. Take off from an airport and fly towards the Sun. when the Sun is low. Example: take off from KFUL Rwy24, at around 1:10 Z Feb 6, no time offset, and fly below 1500 toward KLGB or KTOA. In my system all the trees look golden orange until after the Sun sets. I am unable to post a pic and would make it more easily understood. Thank you for your participation and interest.

Hello MrBits.. and everyone. I Download the AutoHaze and I am in the process of trying to see how I can configure it to give me different visibility and use it in local mode. It's interesting that the DataRefs are very similar to what I found out that may be usefull. It's a sign that there are not many others around that can be useful. Thank you for your help and effort.

Hi everyone. I want to use XP12 more but there are some things that are very annoying, see below. XP has had that problem as far back as I can remember and I never found a way to fix / change it. Flying during sunset the color of the leafs turns / is gold / orange. Looking behind and at time to one side or another in External view they look OK. One of the reasons that I use Time Stay script is to get away from this problem. I select a time when the Sun is low on the horizon to keep the color somewhat green. In my case I fly around LAX area and I have to select 1:26 Z on Feb 6 to get away from this problem. Does anyone know what is causing this (I assume is a texture they use?) and better yet what the fix may be? Thank you.

Hi everyone. As an additional statement, at the other end of the spectrum, there are days where there is visibility over 100SM. I've flown in days where coming from Big bear (L35) you could clearly see the buildings at Catalina (AVX), you get the feeling that you could reach out and touch them. We should be able to simulate all those environments. I included below a few DataRefs that users may want to try and see if they can improve their experience, try different values, make small changes, and change one thing at the time, just put all them in a .lua file and place the file in: Drive\:..\X-Plane12\Resources\plugins\FlyWithLua\Scripts --Copy From here: --ClearVis.lua set("sim/private/controls/scattering/override_turbidity_t",1.0) set("sim/private/controls/scattering/single_rat",0.1) set("sim/private/controls/scattering/multi_rat",0.2) set("sim/private/controls/hdr/bloom1",-8.9) set("sim/private/controls/hdr/bloom_exponent",3.12) --To here When I fly VFR, I only fly during Sunset time, 1:23Z Feb, 6, to keep that time where I want I use a script TimeStayMacro: --Copy From here --TimeStay.lua --[[ --Move Local Time back, TimeStay within the same minute. --Use if you only like to fly at certain times, like Sunset.. --Install the latest version of Lua --Copy the content of this file / text into any FileName.lua --Place that file into X:..\X-Plane 11\Resources\plugins\FlyWithLua\Scripts --To use: In XPlane 11 just start XPlane after you completed the above steps. The script will be automatically loaded. --The most accurate version is the local start_time = os.clock() --Accurate 1sec/ 10min set_back = larger goes forward, increases / later time. --Move Local Time back, TimeStay within the same minute. --Use if you only like to fly at certain times, like Sunset.. --Note: It may be system dependent change set_back= value if needed. --You can enable and disable the code via the FWL macro menu in XPlane>Developer... --]] local zulu_t = dataref_table("sim/time/zulu_time_sec") local start_time = zulu_t[0] local set_back = 30 --60 TimeStay = false function stay_time() if (TimeStay) then if (zulu_t[0] > start_time + set_back) then zulu_t[0] = start_time end else start_time = zulu_t[0] end end --do_often("stay_time()") do_every_frame("stay_time()") add_macro("TimeStay", "TimeStay = true", "TimeStay = false", "deactivate") --To here When I test I never use any Art scrips.... I have other Data scripts that show, Location, time, heading, VSI that are more extensive / longer and I do not want to take too much bandwidth.

Hi Bjoern. Thank you for the response. I do a have a layer of clouds, but is at 30K / Cirrus few. While you are correct that is what XP does, my hope was that someone has found a way around it it, the real life is completely different. I've been real life flying for over 50 years, and instructing for many years and I can tell you that you can be in the soup, no clouds, and break out at 4-5K to a totally clear sky around the coast. Many times pilots log .1 hr of IFR/ IMC in these conditions. There is also a problem with windshield / window reflections in low light / before sunset... and I have a solution for that. I just created clear windows, if any one is interested let me know. I pointed that out to LR before but they seem to think that reflections are more important. I appreciate your input but I am trying to simulate conditions that my group is having to contend with / fly in. It can be very disorienting when you break out in totally clear Wx.

Hi everyone. Goal, create a script that can change visibility for low visibility practice. I created a script, for the pilots that I interface with, included below, that can cycle through multiple visibility values. The problem I am having is that the Sun keeps showing during before Sunset... It can only be used at night with no moon. Tested in default 1244 no addons. I was able to work around that in some prior versions and XP11, but I cannot find a good procedure to get it to work in XP12. I've tried all the Data refs that I could find and none of them were able to mask the Sun, see pic. If any one has a better way to accomplish this, please let me know. I am unable to post a pic, but you can test it in Wx>Manual>Visibity 0.5 SM and go to above 3K Ft during Sunset. Thank you. --ChangeVizUseTV.lua file starts here. Nrs. 1720,450,90 Standard day S.L. Ver0311248 --Note: This Function is also now included in "ViewData_sf24IDdispyLODVIS.lua" --Use when Sun and Moon is NOT in view, see through XP12 problem. --Settings / change to low Visibility can take a while, see your settings in --Flight configuration>Wx>Cutomize>Visibility --Use at night, when Sun out of view / horizont is not visible --Assign a Key or button in Settings>LUA>Views>Key to Cycle viz. --Set for 4K resolution --local visibilities = {100, 1609, 16100, 40234, 160934} --in meters (328ft,1sm,10sm,25sm,100sm) can change seq. and add as many as needed local visibilities = {0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 100} local nextVisibility = 1 local tv_xPosOfviz = 120 --Location where X axis "Vis." word is displayed change if not in view local tv_yPosOfviz = 710 --Location where Y axis vis value is displayed change if not in view local tv_xPosOfviz1 = 230 --Location where X axis vis value is displayed change if not in view set("sim/weather/region/visibility_reported_sm", 35) --to start set("sim/private/controls/stars/gain_photometric", 0.0) --kill stars 16000 is bright --set("sim/private/controls/lighting/E_sun_lx", 0)--add kill Sun not possible? function cycleVisibility() set("sim/weather/region/visibility_reported_sm", (visibilities[nextVisibility])) if nextVisibility < #visibilities then nextVisibility = nextVisibility + 1 else nextVisibility = 1 end end create_command("FlyWithLua/Views/CycleViz", "Key to Cycle viz", "cycleVisibility()", "", "") --You can disable this code if you do not ewant / need to view your Vis / Distance --From here dataref("Distance", "sim/weather/region/visibility_reported_sm", "readonly") function displaytviz() --Displays Viz set in SM --draw_string_Times_Roman_24(tv_xPosOfviz, tv_yPosOfviz, nextVisibility-1, "white" ) --tv_TrimAbbr, visibilities={} Distance = string.format("%03.2f", Distance) --added --draw_string_Times_Roman_24(tv_xPosOfviz, tv_yPosOfviz, "Vis.-SM", "white" ) draw_string_Times_Roman_24(tv_xPosOfviz1, tv_yPosOfviz, Distance, "white" ) end do_every_draw ("displaytviz()") --To here

Hi Everyone. Have any of you (CFI) found a mod and or a complete 172 model that has the proper behavior when performing Commercial / Ground / Flight maneuvers, using Jstick and Rudder pedals? I am unable to find a good mod to get the XP12 to perform properly, by book / practical test standards . I was able to the X11, X10, X9... to get a credible behavior but unable to get good results on X12. Some of the problems are on the ground in Xwind with full power, over banking in left turns and many others.. I've attempted some wing mods, ground friction.. Thank you.

Hi GoranM. I like your picture. You must be part of the fabulous team that developed XP10? I think I am beginning to understand who / what you guys are. Can you post a picture of your whole group? I bet you get a lot of looks when you go out in public? TV

Hi Donald, and everyone. >>..either they may not have thought about the problem, or didn't really think it was that much of a problem.<< I am sure it's both, and that is exactly why people like I am try to help with constructive feedback. All the problems that I have pointed out are fairly easy to fix and would greatly improve the simming experience. One can easily analyze the models, if you look at details that are lacking, when compared to a real life model, and come up with hundreds of inaccuracies. My goal is to point out the biggest deviations that can be easily fixed. The problem becomes, gets compounded, when you see individuals that behave as if they may be involved in the development process that should be thankful for the feedback, they instead try to justify the short comings by attacking the individual that is actually doing them a favor. This is the most difficult part to fix. When one is not willing to take the time to understand, and accept the facts, the issues may never be resolved. As it stands right now, what I see in the present release, and the response, there is little hope of having a credible sim. These individuals don't only disrespect themselves they also insult their customers. I would hope Cessna will look closely to this representation and take action. If a real C172 would behave like the model they have to date, nobody would be buying / flying them. It would scare me right out of aviation, if I did not know any better. TV

Hi wb5okj and everyone. >>...however it is very hard to get this view on a small 2 dimensional flat monitor and still fly. << It is actually very easy to implement. I designed an 182RG, in GMAX for FS9 about 8 years ago, that does that, and I don't even consider myself to be an aircraft designer. See pics below. Here is another example and I can show you many more if you like. The problem is that you get these "experts" defined as "one that knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing" that are allowed, and believed as being right, and the people that actually try to help, and actually know something get edited / pushed out. TV

Hi SF. >>Personal attack removed by Mod. No more of this please. SF<< >>So your perception of both the REAL world, FS and XP all seem to be terribly missled.<< I am not sure I understand how was my statement different than the one you alowed from Morten? I would have approached you on private Email but I do not know How? Who you are. Have you seen other posts directed at me? TV

Hi MortenM. Personal attack removed by Mod. No more of this please. SF