November 23, 20214 yr I apologize for my criticism, but Helsinki's photogrammetry is a rather poor performance from MS / Asobo. Happy: From a distance, Helsinki is real Bad: Close-up of photogrammetry buildings looks scary, as do photogrammetry buildings (this is true all over the world). Helsinki with its buildings is far too white and bright Autogenous forests have grown enormously in the area of photogrammetry and are growing in the middle of motorways, Vuosaari harbor and even on the decks of ships! I also read about oversized trees with Helsinki's photogrammetry modeling to remember Avsim, so the matter has been taken into account internationally At least for me, the framerate and smoothness drop a lot when I fly into and out of the photogrammetry area of Hesa, just at Cessna Personally, I’ve ended up turning off all photogrammetry so everything is fine. Apparently the only hope is to wait (years?) For MS / Asobo to push photogrammetry to a better level in all respects, given my criticism above. If this modeling technology worked smoothly and the quality was like Helsinki's 3D modeling in Google Earth, it would be good!
November 23, 20214 yr Not all photogrammetry cities in the sim look that bad. It all depends on who they bought the data from. Edited November 23, 20214 yr by Tuskin38
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.